Pes Cavus

Pes Cavus

No Results

No Results


Pes cavus is a descriptive term for a foot morphology characterized by high arch of the foot that does not flatten with weightbearing. No specific radiographic definition of pes cavus exists. [1] The deformity can be located in the forefoot, the midfoot, the hindfoot, or a combination of these sites. [2]  Whereas pes cavus is a common finding, occurring in approximately 10% of the general population, [3] it can also be a sign of an underlying neurologic disorder. [4]

The spectrum of associated deformities observed with pes cavus includes clawing of the toes, posterior hindfoot deformity (described as an increased calcaneal angle), contracture of the plantar fascia, and cockup deformity of the great toe. This can cause increased weightbearing for the metatarsal heads and associated metatarsalgia and calluses.

The etiology of pes cavus can be determined approximately 80% of the time. Possible causes include the following:

The remaining 20% of cases are idiopathic and nonprogressive. Identifying the etiology is essential to determine if the deformity is progressive, which assists in operative planning.

Neuromuscular diseases, such as muscular dystrophy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]  spinal dysraphism, polyneuritis, intraspinal tumors, poliomyelitis, syringomyelia, Friedreich ataxia, cerebral palsy, and spinal cord tumors, can cause muscle imbalances that lead to elevated arches. [11] A patient with a new-onset unilateral deformity but without a history of trauma must be evaluated for spinal tumors.

Multiple theories have been proposed for the pathogenesis of pes cavus. Duchenne described intrinsic muscle imbalances causing an elevated arch. Other theories include the extrinsic muscle and a combination of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles being causes of the imbalance.

Mann described the pathogenesis of pes cavus in patients with CMT disease. [12] An understanding of the muscles involved and the sequence of the involvement helps in understanding the deformity. An agonist-antagonist model for the muscles determines the deformity. In CMT disease, the anterior tibialis and the peroneus brevis develop weaknesses. Antagonist muscles, the posterior tibialis and the peroneus longus, pull harder than the other muscles, causing deformity.

Specifically, the peroneus longus pulls harder than the weak anterior tibialis, causing plantarflexion of the first ray and forefoot valgus. [13] The posterior tibialis pulls harder than the weak peroneus brevis, causing forefoot adduction. Intrinsic muscle develops contractures while the long extensor to the toes, recruited to assist in ankle dorsiflexion, causes cockup or claw toe deformity. With the forefoot valgus and the hindfoot varus, increased stress is placed on the lateral ankle ligaments and instability can occur.

In patients with polio, the deformity is in the hindfoot and is caused by weakness of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex. This leads to a marked increase in the calcaneal pitch angle with normal forefoot alignment.

The results of surgical intervention are difficult to compare because of the multiple possible combinations of procedures necessary for successful treatment. Moreover, patients have varying degrees of deformity, disease progression, and underlying etiology, making comparison virtually impossible.

Nevertheless, some positive findings have been reported, such as Wetmore and Drennan’s report that 24% of patients with CMT disease who underwent a triple arthrodesis had satisfactory results at an average of 21 years of follow-up. [14]  They recommended the triple arthrodesis as a salvage procedure.

Mann and Hsu reported on 12 feet in patients with CMT disease that underwent triple arthrodesis, with a follow-up that averaged 7.5 years. [12]  Five feet were plantigrade, asymptomatic, and united. Three feet were plantigrade and asymptomatic but had nonunions. Four feet were nonplantigrade and symptomatic. The authors stated that positioning is the key to satisfactory results.

Roper and Tibrewal reported the results of soft-tissue procedures combined with osteotomies. [15]  Ten cases of CMT disease were reviewed 14 years after surgery. Two patients required repeat surgery secondary to recurrent deformity. At last follow-up, all patients had plantigrade feet, without requiring a triple arthrodesis.

Gould discussed 18 feet in 10 patients with a 3- to 6-year follow-up. [16]  All had satisfactory results with soft-tissue procedures combined with osteotomies, and all patients had plantigrade feet at last follow-up.

Sugathan et al treated lesser-toe clawing in 11 feet (eight patients) with flexible pes cavus using a modified Jones procedure. [17]  At final clinical review, all 11 feet were improved, with minor complications in six. The mean Bristol Foot Score was 27, and the mean modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score was 76, which indicated excellent results. Half of the patients had mild persistent foot pain, but all were satisfied with the outcome.

Naudi et al reported radiologic and clinical results with anterior tarsectomy in 39 cases (33 patients) of pes cavus. [18]  Pain decreased considerably in 75% of cases, and 68% of patients recovered normal activity. The foot was aligned correctly in 67% of cases, but at last follow-up, pes cavus remained undercorrected in 80%. In 74% of feet, adjacent joints showed progressive osteoarthritic degeneration. Subjectively, 70% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with minor reservations, and objective outcome was excellent or good in 66% of feet.

According to Naudi et al, the overall results of this study showed that outcome in terms of function, motion, complications and satisfaction was good, but pain relief results were poor. [18]  They added that anterior tarsectomy is able to correct initial pes cavus deformity and compensate anomalies of the hindfoot, but its correction capacity is limited, and its efficacy in case of clawfoot is poor.

Limitations to the literature exist. Most of the reported results include reviews of adolescents rather than adults. Multiple variables are included with a small population of patients; however, the current trends are toward soft-tissue procedures combined with osteotomies. Arthrodesis is reserved for salvage procedures.

Balsdon ME, Bushey KM, Dombroski CE, LeBel ME, Jenkyn TR. Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle Presents Significant Differences Between Foot Types: A Biplane Fluoroscopy Study. J Biomech Eng. 2016 Oct 1. 138 (10):[Medline].

Wapner KL, Myerson MS. Pes cavus. Myerson MS, ed. Foot and Ankle Disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. 919-941.

Japas LM. Surgical treatment of pes cavus by tarsal V-osteotomy. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968 Jul. 50 (5):927-44. [Medline].


Gallardo E, García A, Combarros O, Berciano J. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication: spectrum of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features in leg and foot muscles. Brain. 2006 Feb. 129 (Pt 2):426-37. [Medline].

Holmes JR, Hansen ST Jr. Foot and ankle manifestations of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle. 1993 Oct. 14 (8):476-86. [Medline].

Sabir M, Lyttle D. Pathogenesis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Gait analysis and electrophysiologic, genetic, histopathologic, and enzyme studies in a kinship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Apr. (184):223-35. [Medline].

Sabir M, Lyttle D. Pathogenesis of pes cavus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 May. (175):173-8. [Medline].

Berciano J, Gallardo E, García A, Pelayo-Negro AL, Infante J, Combarros O. New insights into the pathophysiology of pes cavus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication. J Neurol. 2011 Sep. 258 (9):1594-602. [Medline].

Joo SY, Choi BO, Kim DY, Jung SJ, Cho SY, Hwang SJ. Foot deformity in charcot marie tooth disease according to disease severity. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Aug. 35 (4):499-506. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Martyn CN, Hughes RA. Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Apr. 62 (4):310-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Mann DC, Hsu JD. Triple arthrodesis in the treatment of fixed cavovarus deformity in adolescent patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle. 1992 Jan. 13 (1):1-6. [Medline].

Schuberth JM, Babu-Spencer N. The impact of the first ray in the cavovarus foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009 Jul. 26 (3):385-93, Table of Contents. [Medline].

Wetmore RS, Drennan JC. Long-term results of triple arthrodesis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Mar. 71 (3):417-22. [Medline].

Roper BA, Tibrewal SB. Soft tissue surgery in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Jan. 71 (1):17-20. [Medline].

Gould N. Surgery in advanced Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle. 1984 Mar-Apr. 4 (5):267-73. [Medline].

Sugathan HK, Sherlock DA. A modified Jones procedure for managing clawing of lesser toes in pes cavus: long-term follow-up in 8 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec. 48 (6):637-41. [Medline].

Naudi S, Dauplat G, Staquet V, Parent S, Mehdi N, Maynou C. Anterior tarsectomy long-term results in adult pes cavus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun. 95 (4):293-300. [Medline].

Burns J, Crosbie J, Hunt A, Ouvrier R. The effect of pes cavus on foot pain and plantar pressure. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Nov. 20 (9):877-82. [Medline].

Najafi B, Barnica E, Wrobel JS, Burns J. Dynamic plantar loading index: understanding the benefit of custom foot orthoses for painful pes cavus. J Biomech. 2012 Jun 1. 45 (9):1705-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Burns J, Landorf KB, Ryan MM, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Interventions for the prevention and treatment of pes cavus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17. (4):CD006154. [Medline].

Crosbie J, Burns J. Predicting outcomes in the orthotic management of painful, idiopathic pes cavus. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Sep. 17 (5):337-42. [Medline].

Alexander IJ, Johnson KA. Assessment and management of pes cavus in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Sep. (246):273-81. [Medline].

Jahss MH. Evaluation of the cavus foot for orthopedic treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Dec. (181):52-63. [Medline].

Paulos L, Coleman SS, Samuelson KM. Pes cavovarus. Review of a surgical approach using selective soft-tissue procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Sep. 62 (6):942-53. [Medline].

Mubarak SJ, Van Valin SE. Osteotomies of the foot for cavus deformities in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Apr-May. 29 (3):294-9. [Medline].

Mann RA. Pes cavus. Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, eds. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1993. 785-801.

Brugh AM, Fallat LM, Savoy-Moore RT. Lateral column symptomatology following plantar fascial release: a prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec. 41 (6):365-71. [Medline].

Cheung JT, An KN, Zhang M. Consequences of partial and total plantar fascia release: a finite element study. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Feb. 27 (2):125-32. [Medline].

Mulier T, Dereymaeker G, Fabry G. Jones transfer to the lesser rays in metatarsalgia: technique and long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Oct. 15 (10):523-30. [Medline].

Breusch SJ, Wenz W, Döderlein L. Function after correction of a clawed great toe by a modified Robert Jones transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Mar. 82 (2):250-4. [Medline].

Watanabe RS. Metatarsal osteotomy for the cavus foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Mar. (252):217-30. [Medline].

Groner TW, DiDomenico LA. Midfoot osteotomies for the cavus foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2005 Apr. 22 (2):247-64, vi. [Medline].

Chatterjee P, Sahu MK. A prospective study of Japas’ osteotomy in paralytic pes cavus deformity in adolescent feet. Indian J Orthop. 2009 Jul. 43 (3):281-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Zhou Y, Zhou B, Liu J, Tan X, Tao X, Chen W, et al. A prospective study of midfoot osteotomy combined with adjacent joint sparing internal fixation in treatment of rigid pes cavus deformity. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Jun 5. 9:44. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Siffert RS, del Torto U. “Beak” triple arthrodesis for severe cavus deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Dec. (181):64-7. [Medline].

Norman S Turner, MD Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine

Norman S Turner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Minnesota Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Thomas C Dowd, MD Associate Director of Orthopedic Surgery Residency Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center; Assistant Professor of Surgery, The Norman M Rich Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, F Edward Hebert School of Medicine

Thomas C Dowd, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: AOFAS; JBJS; AOA; AAOS.

Heidi M Stephens, MD, MBA Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Courtesy Joint Associate Professor, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of South Florida College of Public Health

Heidi M Stephens, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Florida Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pes Cavus

Research & References of Pes Cavus|A&C Accounting And Tax Services