Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Rare Appendageal Tumors

Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Rare Appendageal Tumors

No Results

No Results


Cutaneous tumors encompass a vast array of malignancies, from neuroendocrine to lymphoid. In addition to primary malignancies, the skin can also be a major site for metastases of internal cancers. The treatment and diagnosis of many cutaneous tumors is continually changing, and the role of clinicians (eg, primary care physicians, dermatologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists) focuses on an accurate diagnosis and a thorough understanding of the clinical sequelae. [1, 2, 3] This article focuses mainly on nonmelanoma skin cancers, with an emphasis on rare benign and malignant epithelial, dermal, and adnexal tumors.

As with all tumors, whether benign or malignant, the paradigm of comprehension depends on identifying the cell or cell layer of origin. The origin of cutaneous tumors can be simplistically divided into 3 major categories: epidermal, dermal, and adnexal (see image below).

See Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers You Need to Know, a Critical Images slideshow, to help correctly identify these lesions.

Fields et al reviewed 500 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma in a single-institution study. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years. The 5-year overall survival rate was 56%, with about half dying from other causes. The disease-specific death rate was 30%. [4]

Clear cell acanthoma of Degos

One of the most common benign epithelial tumors is seborrheic keratosis/senile keratosis, which is a hereditary lesion that appears in persons aged more than 30 years. On the other hand, clear cell acanthoma is a rare, benign epithelial cutaneous tumor. Typically, the clinical presentation of clear cell acanthoma is a solitary nodule in the lower extremities. It is usually pink or red-brown and is described as glistening. [5]

Clear cell acanthomas usually range in size from 3-20 mm, and they tend to have a little moat or collarette of scale (also called a wafer-like crusty scale) around the edges. Peeling this scale can elicit droplets of blood. Scheinfeld noted that clear cell acanthomas can be brown. [6]

Case reports in the literature report clear cell acanthomas with multiple lesions, (ie, polypoid clear cell acanthoma). [7, 8] Upon histologic examination, the epidermis is abruptly interrupted with acanthotic epidermis. In fact, histologically, it resembles psoriasis. The sharp demarcation of the borders of a clear cell acanthoma distinguishes clear cell acanthoma from psoriasis.

The cells within the acanthotic epidermis stain faintly because of the overload of glycogen content in the keratinocytes. Electron microscopic studies demonstrate that these defective keratinocytes also contain defects in mitochondria and nuclear structures. [7]

Their cells are translucent because of the presence of glycogen, which can be demonstrated by a periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain (and eliminated with diastase) or electron microscopy.

The acanthotic epidermis can also contain dendritic melanocytes, which contain melanin granules interspersed among the abnormal keratinocytes. This presence of melanin provides pigmentation to the benign tumor, and this occurrence has been termed pigmented clear cell acanthoma. [9]

Clear cell acanthoma usually stains positively for epithelial membrane antigen and negatively for carcinoembryonic antigen. With antikeratin antibodies, the clear cell acanthomas stain for AE1 and AE3, but did not stain for CAM5.2. In fact, clear cell acanthoma possesses a similar staining pattern to inflammatory dermatoses such as psoriasis vulgaris, lichen planus, and discoid lupus erythematosus and might be a localized form of inflammatory eruption rather than a neoplasm.

Variants of the clear cell acanthoma have been noted and include polypoid, giant, multiple, and eruptive. It can be treated by surgical excision and cryotherapy, although spontaneous involution has been reported.


Clinical presentation

Keratoacanthomas (KAs; ie, self-healing squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) are benign cutaneous neoplasms, usually solitary, that occur in elderly patients who are frequently exposed to the sun; they often manifest on the face (see image below). The spontaneous involution and eventual disappearance of this lesion within months characterizes the self-healing nature of keratoacanthomas. A study by Wagner et al indicated that KA of the lip arises from the outer root sheath cells of hair follicles, especially the cells associated with the upper outer root sheath. [10]

Clinically, the lesion rapidly increases in size within 6-8 weeks, with the eventual formation of a central keratin plug. During the immunologically mediated regression phase, the central keratin plug is extruded, and only a flat scar remains.

Nodular melanoma can mimic KAs. [11]

Keratoacanthoma lesions can easily be mistaken for SCC. Clinically, the sudden onset and rapid growth are the distinguishing features of keratoacanthoma. SCCs display a more indolent growth rate.

In treating KAs, surgeons face several problems, as follows:

Some umbilicated papules or plaques look like KAs but are actually SCCs. A biopsy is needed to define the process and, if the biopsy cannot firmly establish that the process is a KA, an excision is perhaps the preferred treatment option.

Hypertrophic lupus can histologically imitate SCC and, sometimes, KAs. Specimens should be read by a trained dermatopathologist. If the patient has lupus and a KA or SCC is suspected, a second opinion should be obtained.

KA involutes in most cases; however, the involution can lead to tissue destruction and scarring that permanently impairs function. Thus, on the sensitive eyelid, KA should be treated very promptly. Mohs surgery with plastic reconstruction is the optimal treatment for KA on the eyelid.

Multiple KAs should raise suspicion of Muir-Torre syndrome, a genodermatosis with a defect in the MSH mismatch repair gene that is associated with sebaceous neoplasms and gastrointestinal cancer.

KAs have been noted in multiple reports to arise in tattoos. [12, 13] Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia must be distinguished from a squamous neoplasm.

Primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large-cell lymphomas mimicking keratoacanthomas have been reported. [14]


Histologically, the fully formed domelike lesion reveals a mass of proliferating squamous epithelial cells, which created the central core of keratin. These proliferating cells exhibit no cytologic abnormalities and have a normal nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio. The surrounding normal epidermis is displaced upward with the lesion, providing the characteristic buttress appearance of keratoacanthoma. [15]

Keratoacanthomas are well-contained lesions, but case reports have shown perineural and vascular invasion. [16]

In order to distinguish between keratoacanthoma and SCC, further histologic studies can be used, including proliferating-cell nuclear antigen immunostaining. [17] In keratoacanthoma, cells that stain positive with proliferating-cell nuclear antigen immunostaining are distributed only in the outer edges of the tumor, corresponding to the proliferating squamous epithelial cells. In contrast, in SCC, the cells that stain positive with proliferating-cell nuclear antigen immunostaining are more diffusely distributed.

A class of drugs that treats melanoma with BRAF mutations by inhibiting BRAF has been noted to induce the formation of KAs. [18]


Although these lesions are self-healing, several reports have advocated a more aggressive approach for treatment.

Beham and colleagues have advocated surgical excision because of the difficulties in distinguishing between keratoacanthomas and SCCs upon gross examination. [19]

Gray and colleagues have proposed a more conservative approach, using topical 5-fluorouracil therapy to accelerate the regression phase of the keratoacanthoma without the need for diagnostic biopsy. [20] With 5-fluorouracil treatment, the keratoacanthomas in a limited number of patients had a partial response within 3 weeks and complete resolution within 8 weeks. On the other hand, SCC has a poor response to 5-fluorouracil treatment.

Studies have noted that topical imiquimod demonstrates some efficacy against KAs.

Bowen disease (Bowen precancerous dermatosis) is a common cutaneous process that has invasive potential and can be considered SCC in situ. Patients with Bowen disease possess atypical cells throughout the entire thickness of the epidermitis.

Actinic keratosis (solar keratosis), while possessing atypical cells that do not go the full thickness of the epidermis, are best considered a form of precancer, as only 2-5% will go on to become SCC or Bowen disease. Occurring predominantly on sun-exposed skin, actinic keratoses can be solitary or multiple and are hyperkeratotic scaly macules or papules. Bowen disease predominantly arises in the lower limbs and is characterized by a slowly growing scaly plaque, often resembling patches of dermatitis or psoriasis.

The fibroepithelial tumor of Pinkus is best considered a type of BCC. However, the distinguished dermatopathologist Leboit thinks it might be a fenestrated trichoblastoma. [21] Originally identified by Herman Pinkus in the 1950s, the premalignant fibroepithelial tumor of Pinkus is a distinctive tumor that predominantly occurs on the lower trunk and thighs. These tumors typically develop between the fourth and sixth decade of life. This tumor often appears pedunculated, resembling a fibroma.

Histologically, the tumor is composed of epithelial cells resembling basal cells surrounded with a fibrous stroma. [22] With further cellular characterization, Heenen and colleagues have demonstrated that these basallike epithelial cells have different cell cycle characteristics in comparison to normal epithelial cells. [23] This observation suggests that this dysregulation of the cell cycle is a premalignant phenomenon and represents the potential progression into a transformed, cancerous cell. In rare cases, these faint-staining epithelial cells are replaced by more-aggressive, smaller, dark-staining basaloid cells. These new basaloid cells eventually overtake the lesion; consequently, these tumors develop into an invasive basal cell epithelioma.

Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and SCC comprise the majority of nonmelanoma malignant skin cancers. BCC is the most common malignant neoplasm. BCC is typically locally invasive, but it can metastasize on rare occasions. The most common primary site of metastatic BCC is the scrotum, where the rate of metastatic disease is 12%. Occurrence on the head and neck can also set the stage for the spread of BCC, but this is less common.

SCC is a malignant neoplasm arising from transformed keratinocytes. SCC has rare metastatic potential, but in patients who are immunocompromised (ie, by immunological disease or immunosuppressant medication), SCC is more aggressive and more prone to metastasis.

Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy that is aggressive and often metastasizes to regional lymph nodes. Feng reported clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human MCC, suggesting that this virus might be important in the development of this cancer. [24] Sentinel node biopsy, which is often used to stage melanoma, does not seem to be useful for staging MCC or for predicting survival. [25]

An epidemiology study from Finland of 181 cases bears out the fact that MCC is rare. [26]

Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is unique in the 10-member family of human polyomavirus (HPyV) in that it causes cancer, in particular in the old and in the extensively immunosuppressed patient. [27]  It is found in 60-80% of specimens of Merkel cell cancer. [28, 29]

Through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, Miller and Rabkin have determined that the age-adjusted prevalence of MCC is 0.23 cases and 0.01 cases per 100,000 persons for white persons and black persons, respectively. [30]

The average age of onset for MCC is between the late sixth decade and early seventh decade of life. As with BCC and SCC, MCC has a higher prevalence in patients who are immunosuppressed because of organ transplants or those with HIV infection, with the median age within the fifth decade in one study. [31, 32]

Friedlaender and colleagues have observed that in organ transplant patients, the discontinuation of the immunosuppressant cyclosporine caused temporary regression of MCC metastases. [33]

A 2009 study based on 1980-2004 data from a population-based cancer registry showed increases in standardized incidence rates for rare skin tumors, including MCC, Paget disease, adnexal carcinoma, and sarcoma. [34]

Bichakjian has noted that the incidence of MCC has tripled in the last 20 years. [35] He attributes it to increasing duration of life and has set forth guidelines for multidisciplinary management.

Clinical presentation

The physical appearance of MCC is often that of a solitary nodule or plaque with a red, violaceous color. This tumor may have an appearance similar to BCC; therefore, clinicians must ensure the proper diagnosis and respective treatment of these lesions.

MCC often occurs in sun-exposed skin, with approximately 50% developing on the head and neck and 33% developing on the extremities. [36]  It can also occur on the breast. [37]

Regardless of the treatment, more than 50% of the patients develop regional lymph node metastasis; in approximately 36%, metastases are distant. [38] The most common sites for distant metastases are the brain, bone, liver, and skin. One report noted MCC metastasizing to the pancreas. [39]


While MCPyV is the proximate cause, the etiology of MCC still requires further definition. Merkel cells are accessory cells that secrete nerve growth factors to enable cutaneous nerves to develop into nerve endings. [40] The embryological origin of Merkel cells is also controversial; initially, Merkel cells were believed to have arisen from neural crest cells. However, more recent evidence suggests that fetal Merkel cells are derived from epidermal keratinocytes. [40] Others hypothesize that the cancerous cells in MCC arise from stem cells that develop neuroendocrine properties similar to the wild-type Merkel cells. [41]

Identifying MCC with conventional histologic examinations is difficult because MCC resembles other poorly differentiated neoplasms (eg, cutaneous large cell lymphoma, amelanotic melanoma, small cell carcinoma, Ewing sarcoma). For a definitive diagnosis, electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry studies are required. [42, 43]

Similar to normal Merkel cells, electron microscopy reveals that the cells in MCC contain perinuclear intermediate filaments and electron-dense cytoplasmic secretory granules. In one study, investigators used immunohistochemistry findings to distinguish MCC cells from pulmonary small cell carcinoma. Chan and colleagues identified that the critical difference was the constitutive expression of cytokeratin-20 in Merkel cells and cells from MCC. [44] In contrast, pulmonary small cell carcinomas, which grossly appear similar to MCC, lacked expression of cytokeratin-20.

Molecular basis

In MCC, karyotypic abnormalities have been identified in chromosomes 1, 11, and 13. [45] Further molecular characterization has implicated 2 tumor suppressor genes involved in the molecular pathogenesis of MCC: (1) P73, a member of the TP53 family of tumor suppressors localized on chromosome 1, and (2) SDHD (succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit D), localized on chromosome 11. [46, 47]

The virus MCPyV is certainly an important part of the molecular basis of MCC.

Programmed cell death of ligand 1, which has been shown to be important in SCCs and melanomas, seems to play a similar role in the propagation of MCC and thus might be a future target for chemotherapy combined with surgery. [48]

A study by Behr et al indicated that a strong association exists between the existence of tertiary lymphoid structures in the MCC’s microenvironment and recurrence-free survival. [49]


The clinical workup of a patient with MCC should include chest radiographs and CT scans of the abdomen and chest. Both the chest x-ray films and the CT scans are needed to distinguish a primary MCC with metastases from a primary lung cell carcinoma with skin metastases. The abdominal CT scan is critical for staging investigations because MCC preferentially metastasizes to the liver.

Yiengpruksawan and colleagues at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center developed the staging system for MCC. [46] Stage Ia is primary tumor only, 2 cm in size. Stage Ib is primary tumor only, larger than 2 cm. Stage II is regional node disease. Stage III is distant disease.

Because of the rarity of MCC, clinical treatment protocols for MCC have not been scrutinized and studied in randomized clinical trials. Also, no consensus on postsurgical resection treatment, ie, adjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant radiation therapy, has been reached in the medical literature.  

Surgical excision of MCC with negative margins is the foundation of surgical treatment. [50]  Surgical resection of the primary tumor entails wide excision with 1-3 cm of margin. [46, 51] Tai and colleagues comprehensively reviewed previously published cases of MCC and concluded that complete excision significantly improved overall survival. [36] In addition, tumor size and location greatly impacted the outcome of surgical excision; a worse prognosis has been associated with primary tumors larger than 2 cm and located in the perianal and vulvar regions.

The high rate of local recurrence even after surgical excision (~50%) argues strongly for regional lymphadenectomy. [38] In a limited number of cases, Smith and colleagues demonstrated that patients with local and regional control (excision of primary tumor and regional lymphadenectomy) had 50% lower recurrence and mortality rates. [52] However, in one retrospective study, locoregional control did not significantly improve disease-free survival when compared with local control for MCC localized in the neck. [36]

After surgical excision, adjuvant therapy for MCC is recommended to prevent local recurrence. The three methods of adjuvant therapy are radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and combination therapy with radiation and chemotherapy. A 17-patient series published in 2013 supported the use adjuvant radiotherapy for MCC. [53]

Because MCC is radiosensitive, radiation therapy has been shown to decrease the local recurrence rate. [54] Neck dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy are the foundation for treatment of MCC with positive nodes, while high-risk MCC without positive nodes should also receive adjuvant radiotherapy. [50]  In one retrospective study, Kokoska and colleagues demonstrated that aggressive treatment of MCC with locoregional control (ie, surgical excision and regional lymphadenectomy) in combination with radiation therapy significantly improved survival rates when compared with local excision. [55] In a larger retrospective study, Tai and colleagues demonstrated that radiation therapy improved survival only when used as adjuvant therapy and not as a single, initial treatment. [36] This same study demonstrated that the ideal overall radiation dose is 41-50 Gy. Although a trial has investigated adjuvant prophylactic regional radiotherapy compared with observation in MCC stage I and radiation seems to confer benefits, this question requires further study. [56]

The role of chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy is not well established in the literature. The basis of chemotherapy is for palliative treatment and advanced-stage MCC. [50]  The chemotherapy regimens used most often for treating MCC are etoposide and cisplatin; cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine; and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluouracil. In one study, Boyle and colleagues demonstrated carboplatin and etoposide as effective treatment to reduce regional nodal disease in 8 (40%) of 20 patients; however, chemotherapy was less effective than radiation therapy. [57] In contrast, a small retrospective study by Kokoska et al demonstrated that chemotherapy had no survival benefit. [55] In another retrospective study, Tai and colleagues obtained similar findings. Chemotherapy was associated with a poorer outcome; however, these results are confounded by the fact that the patients had more advanced stages of disease. [58]

For metastatic disease, chemotherapy is rarely curative and serves only as palliative treatment. In the literature, no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal chemotherapy regimen. In a retrospective study by Tai and colleagues, the temporary response rate to chemotherapy for distant disease is higher than 50%; however, the disease soon relapses and the prognosis is poor. Studies have shown no difference in prognosis among the different chemotherapy agents; furthermore, the response to chemotherapy is usually temporary. [59, 60]

Avelumab (Bavencio), an anti–programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1) immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2017 for metastatic MCC in adults and pediatric patients aged 12 years or older.

Approval of avelumab was based on the JAVELIN Merkel 200 open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in 88 patients in whom metastatic MCC had been histologically confirmed and in whom the disease had progressed on or after administration of chemotherapy for distant metastatic disease. The overall response rate reached 33% (29 patients), partial response was 22%, and complete response was 11%. Eight-six percent of tumor responses lasted at least 6 months (25 patients), and 45% lasted at least 12 months (13 patients). Response duration lasted from 2.8 to over 23.3 months. [61]

The combination of radiation and chemotherapy seems to be effective for advanced stages of MCC with local and regional involvement. [62, 63] In a retrospective study of 40 patients, Fenig and colleagues showed that chemotherapy alone was only effective short-term in a regional (lymph node) response, with a 69% partial or complete response. [63] The addition of radiation significantly improved the effectiveness, with a 91% partial or complete response.

Half forehead reconstruction with a single rotational scalp flap for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treatment.

Lyhne suggested that treatment and staging for MCC with curative intent should involve (1) excision of the primary MCC with wide margins, (2) use of the sentinel node biopsy procedure, (3) thorax and abdomen CT scanning or positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, (4) surgical bed adjuvant radiotherapy with (5) for metastatic MCC advanced disease, use of systemic palliative chemotherapy. [64]

The next set of localized abnormalities includes lesions that can emulate tumors. These benign lesions arise from either elastic tissue or dermal collagen. Often appearing to start from the fascia and extend into dermal and subcutaneous fat, these benign fibrotic nodules must be distinguished from fibrosarcomas.

Clinical presentation

Palmar fibromatosis (PF) is a relatively common contracture of the palmar fascia, extending into the fingers, usually the fourth and fifth digits. [65] Contracture and flexion of the fingers at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints characterize Dupuytren contracture. PF is a polyclonal process and, thus, must be deemed to be a type of non-neoplasmic fibroblastic proliferation.

The lesion usually appears after the fifth decade of life, affecting more men than women. Dupuytren contracture (DC) is predominantly found in patients of northern European descent and is often informally termed Vikings disease. Although Dupuytren contracture seems to have a dominant inheritance pattern, the molecular etiology of the lesion remains elusive. [66, 67] Although smoking, alcoholism, and diabetes have been associated with Dupuytren contracture, no definitive causal link has been made.


PF is a disease that involves 2 distinct fibrotic elements, a nodule and a cord. The actual pathogenesis of Dupuytren contractures remains unclear. The nodules begin as outgrowths from the fascia and, based on electron microscopy findings, may contain myofibroblasts. As the lesions mature, the nodules become more collagenous and fibrous, with less cellular content. The resulting cord develops in the fascia, producing the familiar contracture and flexion of the fingers. Moyer and colleagues have reproduced this change from the nodule to the cord in vitro, demonstrating that serial passage of nodule fibroblasts eventually develops into cord fibroblasts. [68] In rare instances, these types of nodules may develop in the plantar fascia.

In plantar fibromatosis, the nodules often grow more rapidly and larger. [69] However, these nodules have less collagen deposition compared with PF and the contracture of the toes is less severe.

Because this disease has a dominant inheritance pattern, many investigators have attempted to identify molecular lesions that predispose patients to Dupuytren contracture. The genes involved in the transforming growth factor pathways are known to mediate proliferation in fibroblasts and are obvious molecular candidates that could be involved. However, recent studies have demonstrated no association between the transforming growth factor genes and Dupuytren contracture. [67, 66]

Children can also present with palmar-plantar fibromatosis. In some such cases reported by Fetsch, the patient had a history of trauma, occasionally involving a foreign body. [70]

The knuckle pad is a manifestation of PF. PF can occur in children in its many forms.

Palmar fasciitis and polyarthritis syndrome (PFPAS) is an uncommon paraneoplastic syndrome that is associated with several malignant neoplasms; in particular, it is associated with ovarian carcinoma.


Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is a treatment for injection into DC that was approved by the FDA in February of 2010 and in the EU in 2011. In a 3-year study of 1,080 CCH-treated joints reported in 2013, [71] 35% recurred; of these recurrences, doctors performed an intervention in 7% of patients. In the 1,080 CCH-treated joints, partial correction of 301 joints occurred in the original study. In these, 50% experienced nondurable responses. While treatment failures occurred, adverse effects were rare. In most joints successfully treated, a contracture remained well beneath the threshold for surgical intervention 3 years post treatment. Recurrence rates in effectively treated joints appeared lower compared with nondurable response rates in partially corrected joints.

If the decision is made to treat PF, then surgery is the treatment of choice. Mild or moderate disease, it seems, should just be monitored.

Patients with a mild Dupuytren contracture and some disability can be monitored for several years without surgical intervention.

The criteria for surgical intervention include a metacarpophalangeal joint contracture of greater than 30º or any proximal interphalangeal joint contracture. The surgery entails a fasciectomy. For a more detailed discussion, see Dupuytren Contracture.

Nodular fasciitis or pseudosarcomatous lesions are benign proliferations that are often idiopathic or develop in response to trauma. [72] These lesions are often mistaken for fibrosarcomas or liposarcomas.

Clinical presentation

Nodular fasciitis lesions may appear in persons of any age, with the peak incidence between the second and fourth decades of life. Sex distribution is equal.

The most common site is the volar portion of the forearm, but nodular fasciitis can appear anywhere. The chest and back are other common sites for nodular fasciitis lesions. Nodular fasciitis lesions usually appear as rapidly growing solitary nodules that are often tender and typically develop over a 2- to 3-week period. [73]

Most cases are idiopathic; however, 10-15% are associated with previous trauma.

Another variant, called dermal nodular fasciitis, can involve the external ear region, cheeks, and scalp. [74]


Nodular fasciitis lesions arise in the deep dermis and consist of a haphazard arrangement of immature, spindle-shaped or triangular mesenchymal cells in a feathery pattern within the context of myxoid stroma.

Based on immunohistochemistry studies, the cells in nodular fasciitis lesions stain with smooth muscle–specific actin and desmin, suggesting a myofibroblastic origin of these mesenchymal cells. [73] On the periphery of these lesions, capillary proliferation is abundant and contributes to the extravasated red blood cells that are often intermixed in the stroma. The cells have prominent nucleoli, and mitotic activity is high, corresponding to the rapid growth rate of nodular fasciitis lesions. Because of the immature appearance of the cells and the high mitotic activity, nodular fasciitis lesions can easily be confused with sarcomas; therefore, proper diagnosis is critical in order to exclude malignancy. [75, 76]


Because of the resemblance to malignant lesions, the clinical management of nodular fasciitis lesions necessitates proper diagnosis.

In a limited number of patients, Stanley and colleagues reported that fine-needle aspiration is an effective method for diagnosing nodular fasciitis lesions. [77] All 11 of their patients had spontaneous resolution of lesions within 11 months and did not require surgical excisions.

In contrast, others have reported difficulty with the capability of cytology findings to distinguish nodular fasciitis lesions from malignant low-grade sarcomas. [78, 76] Despite this limitation, fine-needle aspiration and cytology results can help differentiate metastatic carcinoma, lymphoma, high-grade sarcoma, and infectious processes.

In the context of the clinical history, the proper diagnosis of nodular fasciitis lesions can usually be identified properly with fine-needle aspiration. [73] For lesions with equivocal fine-needle aspiration results, surgical excision and subsequent histologic studies can be used for proper diagnosis.

Even with positive margins on the biopsy specimen, the nodular fasciitis lesions do not reappear. [79, 73, 80] If the lesion recurs, then a different diagnosis must be considered. For larger lesions for which complete surgical excision may be difficult, Graham and colleagues used corticosteroid injections to reduce the size of the lesion. [81]

Dermatofibromas (DFs) are common benign cutaneous tumors. Of unknown etiology, DFs usually occur as solitary lesions on the extremities; however, they may appear as multiple nodules. Multiple nodules (>15) can be a sign of lupus or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Recent evidence of clonal growth within the lesion suggests that DFs are true neoplastic growths rather than the result of reactive processes. [82] One of the variants of DF is cellular DF, which has been reported have a local recurrence rate of 26%. [83]

DF can be diagnosed clinically because, when squeezed, they display the dimple sign. The presence of factor XIIIa in cells is thought to indicate a DF rather than a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). The presence of CD34, on the other hand, is positive for DFSP and not DF. However, these immuno stains are not always foolproof.

See the list below:

Clinical presentation

DFSP is usually a slow-growing neoplasm in the dermis that appears as a firm, indurated plaque, which can be either red or blue. [84] The DFSP typically appears on the trunk and extremities; however, case reports have shown that DFSP can occur on the scalp or the face. [85] As the lesion develops, multiple protuberant nodules form within the indurated plaque.

Local recurrence is common because the tumor has microscopic extensions beyond the visible lesion; therefore wide excision is recommended for treatment. Some have stated that Mohs surgery is preferred as a treatment. DFSP rarely metastasizes.

DFSP should not be treated with radiation, as this can cause the neoplasm to exhibit more aggressive behavior.


Upon histologic examination, DFSP involves the dermis and often the subcutaneous fat. The lesion consists of plump spindle cells, which radiate from a fibrous center to form the characteristic cartwheel or storiform pattern. This characteristic storiform pattern does not occur in DFs. Corresponding clinically to an indolent growth rate, the lesion contains infrequent mitotic figures. The lesion is not as well defined at the margins, with increased collagen deposition that blends in with the normal dermis. Fingerlike projections of this lesion extend into normal tissue, thereby establishing territory in seemingly normal tissue. This extension often creates difficulties in excising the lesion and is the basis for its frequent recurrence.

The origin of the cell of DFSP remains controversial. Through tissue culture studies, Shindo and colleagues have concluded that the DFSP cells are of histocytic origin. [86] Through electron microscopic studies, other investigators have concluded DFSP cells have characteristics that resemble fibroblasts or myofibroblasts. [87, 88]

Although the characteristic cartwheel pattern can be used to distinguish DF from DFSP, cellular DF can appear similar to DFSP, making histologic diagnosis difficult. With the exclusive expression of the hematopoietic progenitor antigen CD-34 in cells from DFSP, immunohistochemistry studies have been used to differentiate DFSP from DF and cellular DF. [89, 90, 91]

In the era of cytogenetics and molecular biology, a characteristic reciprocal translocation, t(17;22)(q22;q13), has been identified for DFSP, [92, 93] creating the fusion of collagen type I alpha 1 (COL1A1) to platelet-derived growth factor beta (PDGFB). [94] This rearrangement fuses the COL1A1 to the PDGFB chain. However, this fusion product may not necessarily be the oncogenic factor responsible for DFSP. This translocation deletes exon 1 of PDGFB, resulting in the elimination of the normal regulation of the PDGFB gene. In addition, the resulting COL1A1/PDGF-B fusion protein is processed and dimerized to become PDGF-BB, which can then act as a ligand to the PDGFB receptor. [95] The combination of dysregulation of the PDGFB gene at the chromosomal locus and at the posttranslational step presumably results in the constitutive activation of the PDGFB receptor, providing autocrine signals for the cells to proliferate.

For diagnostic purposes, Nishio and colleagues used comparative genomic hybridization as a method to distinguish between DF and DFSP, focusing on chromosomes 17 and 22 as critical determinants. [96] However, comparative genomic hybridization is a cumbersome, time-consuming technique and is currently impractical as a clinical diagnostic tool. On a more practical level, other investigators have used reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction to amplify and identify the COL1A1-PDGFB fusion product. [94, 97, 98]


DFSP is a difficult lesion to treat because of the high rate of recurrences. Surgical excision requires both proper diagnosis at presentation and effective treatment.

DFSP on the face can be removed successfully with wide surgical excision and closure with rotational flaps. [99]

DFSP lesions smaller than 2 cm in diameter are often mistakenly identified as DFs or keloids. [100] D’Andrea and colleagues further argue for aggressive surgical treatment with excision of 5 cm of surrounding tissue in order to prevent local recurrences.

In a small retrospective study, Sun and colleagues concluded that radiation as adjuvant therapy helps reduce the rate of local recurrences. [101]

Originally effective for inhibiting the BCR/ABL fusion product in persons with chronic myelogenous leukemia, the drug STI571 (Gleevac) has also been used to inhibit other tyrosine kinases, including c-kit and the platelet-derived growth factor receptors. Because the translocation in DFSP is associated with constitutive activation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, several labs have used tissue culture and animal models to demonstrate that the drug STI571 is able to inhibit proliferation of cells derived from DFSP or cells that express the COL1A1-PDGFB fusion product. [102, 103] These results are encouraging and may lead to the future use of STI571 as either neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for DFSP.

Recent reports have supported the use of imatinib mesylate. [104]

The most common tumor of adipose origin is the lipoma. Lipomas appear as painless, round, mobile masses that are well circumscribed and often pseudo-encapsulated. [105] These benign lesions are often located in the subcutaneous tissues of the head, neck, shoulders, and back. The average age at presentation is between the fourth and sixth decades of life. Histologic examination reveals mature adipose tissue, often encapsulated by fibrous layers. Focal points of necrosis or calcification can also be seen.

Most lipomas can be managed conservatively. If the lipoma becomes painful or begins to grow rapidly, then surgical excision is definitive treatment. Note that lipoma can infiltrate into muscles. The removal of such infiltration leads to bleeding and can lead to postoperative hematomas. Therefore, larger and deeper lipomas should be removed under controlled conditions by a skilled surgeon so proper surgical dissection can occur.

Variants of lipomas include angiolipomas, spindle cell lipomas, and pleomorphic lipomas. Angiolipomas tend to be more painful than lipomas. All lipomas must be distinguished from liposarcomas. Therefore, tissue should be sent for histopathological examination. In contrast to surgical excision, lipomas may be treated with liposuction.

In contrast to lipomas, angiolipomas usually occur in much younger persons, eg, adolescents. These lesions consist of painful, well-circumscribed subcutaneous nodules with a marked capillary component. They are often located along the upper extremities and trunk.

Spindle cell lipomas [106] and pleomorphic lipomas [107] are 2 variants of lipomas that are easily confused with liposarcomas upon histologic examination. Both of these benign tumors have well-demarcated margins and usually occur on the back or on the posterior surface of the neck and shoulders. Histologically, both of these tumors contain mature lipocytes within a mucinous background. In spindle cell lipoma, the lesion also contains fibroblastlike spindle cells that are associated with bundles of collagen. In contrast, the pleomorphic lipomas contain multinucleated giant cells associated with the bundles of collagen.

See the list below:

Clinical presentation

Liposarcomas usually manifest in the fifth to seventh decade of life. However, case reports have been published that describe liposarcomas in the pediatric population. [108]

These tumors manifest clinically on the proximal lower and upper extremities or within the retroperitoneum. Liposarcomas often grow very large.

Liposarcomas exhibit a variety of histologic variants, including well-differentiated, myxoid, round cell, and pleomorphic. The well-differentiated subtype contains lipocytes and appears histologically similar to lipomas. The other subtypes contain cells (lipoblasts) that have a more primitive differentiation, resembling fetal fat cells with characteristic lipid-containing vacuoles that abut the nucleus. The most common variant is the myxoid subtype, which is histologically characterized by the presence of stellate mesenchymal cells with a sparse amount of lipoblasts. Clinically, the round cell and pleomorphic variants are more aggressive than the myxoid and well-differentiated subtypes; therefore, they are associated with a worse prognosis and have a tendency to recur after surgical excision.


Of all the subtypes, the best-characterized subtype is the myxoid variant.

Crozat and colleagues identified a characteristic balanced chromosomal translocation, creating the TLS-CHOP fusion protein. [109] The exact function and role of this fusion protein in actual tumorigenesis remains a mystery.


The surgical treatment for liposarcoma entails excision and, if possible, resection with wide margins, depending on anatomic constraints. [110, 111]

Radiation therapy and chemotherapy as adjuvant treatments have been proposed and attempted on individual patients, but they have not been studied rigorously in clinical trials. [112, 113]

Radiotherapy for liposarcoma of the vulva was reported effective by Yokouchi in 2000. [114] Randomized trials need to be performed to define the role of radiation.

Although often classified together as sweat glands, the apocrine and eccrine glands are 2 distinctive types of glands, differing in embryological origin and function. Apocrine glands are derived from the pilosebaceous follicles, which also include the hair follicles and the sebaceous glands. In contrast, the eccrine glands are considered the true sweat glands. This section focuses on tumors of the sebaceous, apocrine, and eccrine glands.

Sebaceous gland tumors can vary from the benign (hyperplasia of the sebaceous gland) to the malignant (sebaceous carcinoma). Hyperplasia of the sebaceous gland often manifests in elderly persons and can be clinically mistaken for BCC.

Sebaceous hyperplasia is a very common finding in white persons aged more than 50 years, particularly in those who have rosacea. It appears as yellow papules. Sebaceous hyperplasia can resemble basal cell carcinoma, fibrous papules, milia, and closed comedones. Treatment can be effected with trichloroacetic acid 20-30% or with curette and light electrodesiccation.

Benign sebaceous adenomas are rare benign tumors. [115] Histologically, these lesions resemble sebaceous glands, and they must be distinguished from sebaceous gland hyperplasia, especially with limited tissue specimens from small biopsy samples. In contrast to the normal sebaceous gland, sebaceous adenomas contain lobular patterns that are irregular (see image below). In addition, the adenomas contain dark-staining basaloid cells, which surround lipid-containing cells that are smaller than the cells in the normal sebaceous gland. Surgical excision without wide margins is curative, and recurrence is extraordinarily rare.

Troy and Ackerman defined the term sebaceoma as a benign neoplasm of basaloid cells with varying numbers of mature sebocytes. [116] Steffen and Ackerman illustrated many examples of sebaceoma. [117]

See the list below:

Clinical presentation

Carcinomas of the sebaceous gland are rare malignant tumors that usually occur in the sebaceous glands of the eyelids, but they can also occur in the head and neck. [118, 119] Case reports have described sebaceous carcinomas located in the vulva. [120, 121]

This lesion is composed of lipid-containing cells that appear foamy and pale. Sudan IV staining confirms the presence of lipids in these foamy cells. The nuclei are pleomorphic and hyperchromatic. If the tumor is well differentiated, the lesion may contain a peripheral layer of dark-staining basaloid cells, resembling BCCs. The tumor typically spreads by direct extension.


Snow and colleagues advocate Mohs microscopy surgery. [122] To minimize local recurrence, this study suggests the removal of an additional layer via Mohs surgery, especially in persons with evidence of intraepithelial spread.

Cook and colleagues also recommend conjunctival map biopsies to assess whether or not the lesion has extended into the conjunctiva. [123]

The metastatic potential for sebaceous carcinoma is greatest when it occurs on the eyelids. The existence of sebaceous adenoma or carcinoma should raise the possibility of Muir-Torre syndrome, which can also be related to tumors of the intestines.

Local radiation treatment may be an alternative treatment, especially for patients who do not want surgery. [124]

Hidradenoma papilliferum

Hidradenoma papilliferum is a benign adenoma of the apocrine gland that occurs in the vulva and perineum of adult women. This lesion is a benign papillary tumor with cystic characteristics. Although considered a skin lesion of the anogenital region in women, case reports have described these lesions outside the anogenital region in both sexes. These nonanogenital hidradenoma papilliferum have been termed ectopic hidradenoma papilliferum and occur frequently (60%) in the head and neck region. [125] Simple surgical excision is definitive treatment. [125, 126]

Apocrine adenocarcinoma (extramammary Paget disease)

Clinical presentation

Paget disease commonly refers to the malignant infiltration of breast cancer (typically ductal carcinoma) into the apocrine glands of the areola of the nipple. Extramammary Paget disease is a rare tumor that occurs in the anogenital region that is often, but not necessarily always, associated with adenocarcinoma of the apocrine gland. [127] Cases have been reported that demonstrate Paget disease arising from transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, adenocarcinoma of the rectum, and squamous carcinoma of the cervix.

Histologically, the thickened epidermis is infiltrated by Paget cells, which are large pale cells with clear cytoplasm. If the cells are derived from mucin-secreting epithelium, then staining with Alcian blue dye can reveal the deposition of mucin within the cytoplasm. This presence of mucin is diagnostically important. In contrast, in extramammary Paget disease from SCC, mucin is absent and is not a distinguishing factor; therefore diagnostic difficulties arise because of the complexity in distinguishing atypical melanocytic hyperplasia from squamous carcinoma in situ. [128, 129] Definitive diagnosis requires immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy sample.


For minimally invasive extramammary Paget disease, treatment options include surgical excision with clear margins or Mohs microscopy surgery. [130, 127]

Vigilance is needed after removal of the lesion because it has a high rate of recurrence.

The terminology and nomenclature used to describe and distinguish between apocrine and eccrine tumors is confusing. Fortunately, histologic examination reveals the distinctive feature of sweat duct (eccrine) tumors: the double layer of epithelium. [128] Benign eccrine gland tumors include syringoma and eccrine poroma.

Syringomas occur around the eyes, axilla, or anogenital region. This distribution pattern is similar to apocrine tumors. [131] This tumor is a benign hamartomatous lesion. The presence of succinic dehydrogenases and phosphorylases provides evidence that this lesion is of eccrine origin. Syringomas can occur as solitary or multiple lesions. [132] Removal of these lesions has had variable results. [133] In a case report, Belardi and colleagues used cryotherapy as a successful treatment to remove multiple, painful syringomas. [131] Syringomas are associated with Down syndrome.

Eccrine poroma is a benign tumor that typically occurs on the palms and soles. [134] This lesion is superficial and arises within the epidermis, with sharply demarcated borders. As the lesion develops, the tumor grows into the dermis layer. Upon histologic examination, the lesion contains small, pale cells with oval-shaped, centrally located nuclei. The pale-staining aspect of these cells distinguishes them from the dark-staining cells of BCC. Other evidence suggests that some of these lesions may actually be derived from the apocrine gland rather than the eccrine gland. [135] The preferred treatment is surgical excision. [136] Although extraordinarily rare, the malignant variant (eccrine porocarcinoma) does occur. The eccrine poroma is sometimes friable and resembles a pyogenic granuloma.

Primary eccrine carcinomas are rare malignant tumors with variable histologic forms, including eccrine porocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma. [137] All these tumors have the capacity to metastasize to skin and regional lymph nodes.

Eccrine porocarcinoma is the malignant variant of eccrine poroma. [138] The lesion is characterized histologically by intradermal islands of anaplastic cells bordered by acanthotic epidermis. As the tumor progresses, these anaplastic cells invade the dermal layer. The traditional treatment for eccrine porocarcinoma is wide local excision. Alternatively, Wittenberg and colleagues have demonstrated that Mohs micrographic surgery is effective, with no local recurrence in a limited number of patients. [139] For metastatic lesions, Barzi and colleagues used the combination of isotretinoin and interferon-alfa as a chemotherapy regimen, with moderate success. [140]

Clear cell eccrine carcinomas consist of cells with clear cytoplasm and prominent round or oval hyperchromatic nuclei. [141] The abundance of glycogen contributes to the distinctive cytoplasm. Case reports demonstrate difficulties in treating clear cell eccrine carcinomas because of frequent local recurrences. [142] In addition, chemotherapy has been ineffective against metastatic disease.

Mucinous carcinoma typically develops on the eyelids. [143, 144] The tumor contains clusters of small, dark basophilic cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm surrounded by pools of mucin. This lesion often appears as a poorly differentiated infiltrating tumor with similarities to anaplastic squamous carcinoma. Traditional treatment is excisional biopsy, but definitive treatment is difficult and is complicated by the high rate of local recurrence. [145, 146]

The classic features of a benign pilomatricoma—pleomorphic basaloid cells accompanied by central areas with keratotic material, shadow or ghost cells, and zones of necrosis with surrounding stromal desmoplasia—suggest a carcinoma rather than a benign neoplasm. Perforating pilomatricoma manifesting as an ulcer on the external ear’s helix was noted in a 2014 report. [147]

Features of pilomatrical carcinoma, which are more fulminant and exuberant than those of pilomatricoma, include asymmetry, poor circumscription, large and variably-shaped aggregations of pleomorphic basaloid cells, basaloid cells with vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli, atypical mitotic figures, very extensive areas of necrosis en masse, ulceration, and infiltrative growth patterns. No single feature is diagnostic of pilomatrical carcinoma and immunohistochemistry does not distinguish benign from malignant pilomatrical neoplasia.

Pilomatricomal carcinoma has been most often treated with wide surgical excision, although Mohs micrographic surgery has been reported effective. Radiation therapy may have a role in the palliation of metastatic pilomatrical carcinoma, which is usually fatal. [148] (Text reproduced with permission from the Dermatology Online Journal.)

Banks PD, Sandhu S, Gyorki DE, Johnston ML, Rischin D. Recent Insights and Advances in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma. J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jul. 12 (7):637-46. [Medline].

Saini AT, Miles BA. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: pathogenesis, current and emerging treatment options. Onco Targets Ther. 2015. 8:2157-67. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Tothill R, Estall V, Rischin D. Merkel cell carcinoma: emerging biology, current approaches, and future directions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015. e519-26. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF, et al. Five hundred patients with merkel cell carcinoma evaluated at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2011 Sep. 254(3):465-75. [Medline].

Lacarrubba F, de Pasquale R, Micali G. Videodermatoscopy improves the clinical diagnostic accuracy of multiple clear cell acanthoma. Eur J Dermatol. 2003 Nov-Dec. 13(6):596-8. [Medline].

Scheinfeld N. A glistening brown nodule. Pigmented clear cell acanthoma. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Feb. 143(2):255-60. [Medline].

Desmons F, Breuillard F, Thomas P, Leonardelli J, Hildebrand HF. Multiple clear-cell acanthoma (Degos): histochemical and ultrastructural study of two cases. Int J Dermatol. 1977 Apr. 16(3):203-13. [Medline].

Inaloz HS, Patel G, Knight AG. Polypoid clear cell acanthoma: case report. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000 Nov. 14(6):511-2. [Medline].

Langer K, Wuketich S, Konrad K. Pigmented clear cell acanthoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1994 Apr. 16(2):134-9. [Medline].

Wagner VP, Martins MD, Dillenburg CS, et al. Histogenesis of keratoacanthoma: histochemical and immunohistochemical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Mar. 119(3):310-7. [Medline].

Muthupalaniappen L, Das S, Md Nor N, Ali SA. Nodular Melanoma Mimicking Keratoacanthoma: Lessons to learn. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug. 12(3):360-3. [Medline].

Chorny JA, Stephens FV, Cohen JL. Eruptive keratoacanthomas in a new tattoo. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Nov. 143(11):1457-8. [Medline].

Kluger N, Plantier F. Pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia, keratoacanthoma, and squamous cell carcinoma occurring within tattoos: diagnostic issues. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Nov. 57(5):901-2. [Medline].

Martin JM, Ricart JM, Monteagudo C, et al. Primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large-cell lymphomas mimicking keratoacanthomas. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007 Nov. 32(6):668-71. [Medline].

Mehregan AH, Pinkus H. Pinkus’ Guide to Dermatohistopathology. 6th ed. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1995.

Cooper PH, Wolfe JT 3rd. Perioral keratoacanthomas with extensive perineural invasion and intravenous growth. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Sep. 124(9):1397-401. [Medline].

Phillips P, Helm KF. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen distribution in keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol. 1993 Oct. 20(5):424-8. [Medline].

Mattei PL, Alora-Palli MB, Kraft S, Lawrence DP, Flaherty KT, Kimball AB. Cutaneous effects of BRAF inhibitor therapy: a case series. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb. 24(2):530-7. [Medline].

Beham A, Regauer S, Soyer HP, Beham-Schmid C. Keratoacanthoma: a clinically distinct variant of well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol. 1998 Sep. 5(5):269-80. [Medline].

Gray RJ, Meland NB. Topical 5-fluorouracil as primary therapy for keratoacanthoma. Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Jan. 44(1):82-5. [Medline].

Bowen AR, LeBoit PE. Fibroepithelioma of pinkus is a fenestrated trichoblastoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005 Apr. 27(2):149-54. [Medline].

Barr RJ, Herten RJ, Stone OJ. Multiple premalignant fibroepitheliomas of Pinkus: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 1978 Mar. 21(3):335-7. [Medline].

Heenen M, Lambert JC, Achten G, Galand P. Kinetics of cell proliferation in benigh and premalignant tumors of the human epidermis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1975 Apr. 54(4):825-7. [Medline].

Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science. 2008 Feb 22. 319(5866):1096-100. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Fritsch VA, Camp ER, Lentsch EJ. Sentinel lymph node status in Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: not a predictor of survival. Head Neck. 2014 Apr. 36(4):571-9. [Medline].

Kukko H, Bohling T, Koljonen V, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma – a population-based epidemiological study in Finland with a clinical series of 181 cases. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar. 48(5):737-42. [Medline].

Dalianis T, Hirsch HH. Human polyomaviruses in disease and cancer. Virology. 2013 Mar 15. 437(2):63-72. [Medline].

Mogha A, Fautrel A, Mouchet N, et al. Merkel cell polyomavirus small T antigen mRNA level is increased following in vivo UV-radiation. PLoS One. 2010 Jul 2. 5(7):e11423. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Mangana J, Dziunycz P, Kerl K, Dummer R, Cozzio A. Prevalence of Merkel cell polyomavirus among Swiss Merkel cell carcinoma patients. Dermatology. 2010. 221(2):184-8. [Medline].

Miller RW, Rabkin CS. Merkel cell carcinoma and melanoma: etiological similarities and differences. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Feb. 8(2):153-8. [Medline].

Penn I, First MR. Merkel’s cell carcinoma in organ recipients: report of 41 cases. Transplantation. 1999 Dec 15. 68(11):1717-21. [Medline].

Calza L, Beltrami C, Manfredi R, Colangeli V, Freo E, Chiodo F. Merkel cell carcinoma in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient. Br J Dermatol. 2002 May. 146(5):895-8. [Medline].

Friedlaender MM, Rubinger D, Rosenbaum E, Amir G, Siguencia E. Temporary regression of Merkel cell carcinoma metastases after cessation of cyclosporine. Transplantation. 2002 Jun 15. 73(11):1849-50. [Medline].

Riou-Gotta MO, Fournier E, Danzon A, et al. Rare skin cancer: a population-based cancer registry descriptive study of 151 consecutive cases diagnosed between 1980 and 2004. Acta Oncol. 2009. 48(4):605-9. [Medline].

Bichakjian CK, Lowe L, Lao CD, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary management. Cancer. 2007 Jul 1. 110(1):1-12. [Medline].

Tai PT, Yu E, Tonita J, Gilchrist J. Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin. J Cutan Med Surg. 2000 Oct. 4(4):186-95. [Medline].

Nambudiri VE, Vivero M, Watson AJ, et al. Merkel Cell Carcinoma Presenting as Subcutaneous Breast Masses: An Uncommon Presentation of a Rare Neuroendocrine Neoplasm. Breast J. 2016 Jan-Feb. 22 (1):113-5. [Medline].

Hitchcock CL, Bland KI, Laney RG 3rd, Franzini D, Harris B, Copeland EM 3rd. Neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma of the skin. Its natural history, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann Surg. 1988 Feb. 207(2):201-7. [Medline].

Bhardwaj N, Haiart S, Kanhere HA, Maddern GJ. Merkel cell carcinoma metastasis to the pancreas: report of a rare case and a review of the literature. JOP. 2014 Jan 10. 15(1):63-5. [Medline].

Narisawa Y, Hashimoto K, Nihei Y, Pietruk T. Biological significance of dermal Merkel cells in development of cutaneous nerves in human fetal skin. J Histochem Cytochem. 1992 Jan. 40(1):65-71. [Medline].

Hoefler H, Denk H, Lackinger E, Helleis G, Polak JM, Heitz PU. Immunocytochemical demonstration of intermediate filament cytoskeleton proteins in human endocrine tissues and (neuro-) endocrine tumours. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1986. 409(5):609-26. [Medline].

Warner TF, Uno H, Hafez GR, et al. Merkel cells and Merkel cell tumors. Ultrastructure, immunocytochemistry and review of the literature. Cancer. 1983 Jul 15. 52(2):238-45. [Medline].

Sibley RK, Dehner LP, Rosai J. Primary neuroendocrine (Merkel cell?) carcinoma of the skin. I. A clinicopathologic and ultrastructural study of 43 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985 Feb. 9(2):95-108. [Medline].

Chan JK, Suster S, Wenig BM, Tsang WY, Chan JB, Lau AL. Cytokeratin 20 immunoreactivity distinguishes Merkel cell (primary cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinomas and salivary gland small cell carcinomas from small cell carcinomas of various sites. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 Feb. 21(2):226-34. [Medline].

Leonard JH, Leonard P, Kearsley JH. Chromosomes 1, 11, and 13 are frequently involved in karyotypic abnormalities in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1993 May. 67(1):65-70. [Medline].

Yiengpruksawan A, Coit DG, Thaler HT, Urmacher C, Knapper WK. Merkel cell carcinoma. Prognosis and management. Arch Surg. 1991 Dec. 126(12):1514-9. [Medline].

Van Gele M, Kaghad M, Leonard JH, et al. Mutation analysis of P73 and TP53 in Merkel cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2000 Feb. 82(4):823-6. [Medline].

Lipson EJ, Vincent JG, Loyo M, et al. PD-L1 expression in the Merkel cell carcinoma microenvironment: association with inflammation, Merkel cell polyomavirus and overall survival. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Jul. 1(1):54-63. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Behr DS, Peitsch WK, Hametner C, et al. Prognostic value of immune cell infiltration, tertiary lymphoid structures and PD-L1 expression in Merkel cell carcinomas. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Oct. 157(11):7610-21. [Medline].

Miles BA, Goldenberg D, Education Committee of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS). Merkel cell carcinoma: Do you know your guidelines?. Head Neck. 2016 May. 38 (5):647-52. [Medline].

Ott MJ, Tanabe KK, Gadd MA, et al. Multimodality management of Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Surg. 1999 Apr. 134(4):388-92; discussion 392-3. [Medline].

Smith DE, Bielamowicz S, Kagan AR, Anderson PJ, Peddada AV. Cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma. A report of 35 cases. Am J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jun. 18(3):199-203. [Medline].

Morand G, Vital D, Pezier T, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single institutional experience. J Skin Cancer. 2013. 2013:325086. [Medline].

Gollard R, Weber R, Kosty MP, Greenway HT, Massullo V, Humberson C. Merkel cell carcinoma: review of 22 cases with surgical, pathologic, and therapeutic considerations. Cancer. 2000 Apr 15. 88(8):1842-51. [Medline].

Kokoska ER, Kokoska MS, Collins BT, Stapleton DR, Wade TP. Early aggressive treatment for Merkel cell carcinoma improves outcome. Am J Surg. 1997 Dec. 174(6):688-93. [Medline].

Jouary T, Leyral C, Dreno B, et al. Adjuvant prophylactic regional radiotherapy versus observation in stage I Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentric prospective randomized study. Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr. 23(4):1074-80. [Medline].

Boyle F, Pendlebury S, Bell D. Further insights into the natural history and management of primary cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jan 15. 31(2):315-23. [Medline].

Tai PT, Yu E, Winquist E, et al. Chemotherapy in neuroendocrine/Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: case series and review of 204 cases. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jun. 18(12):2493-9. [Medline].

Crown J, Lipzstein R, Cohen S, et al. Chemotherapy of metastatic Merkel cell cancer. Cancer Invest. 1991. 9 (2):129-32. [Medline].

Redmond J III, Perry J, Sowray P, Vukelja SJ, Dawson N. Chemotherapy of disseminated Merkel-cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1991 Aug. 14(4):305-7. [Medline].

Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O, Bhatia S, Terheyden P, D’Angelo SP, et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct. 17 (10):1374-1385. [Medline].

Fenig E, Lurie H, Sulkes A. The use of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1993 Feb. 16(1):54-7. [Medline].

Fenig E, Brenner B, Katz A, Rakovsky E, Hana MB, Sulkes A. The role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1997 Sep 1. 80(5):881-5. [Medline].

Lyhne D, Lock-Andersen J, Dahlstrom K, et al. Rising incidence of Merkel cell carcinoma. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Dec. 45(6):274-80. [Medline].

Frank PL. An update on Dupuytren’s contracture. Hosp Med. 2001 Nov. 62(11):678-81. [Medline].

Wilbrand S, Ekbom A, Gerdin B. Dupuytren’s contracture and sarcoma. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2002 Feb. 27(1):50-2. [Medline].

Bayat A, Watson JS, Stanley JK, et al. Genetic susceptibility in Dupuytren’s disease. TGF-beta1 polymorphisms and Dupuytren’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar. 84(2):211-5. [Medline].

Moyer KE, Banducci DR, Graham WP 3rd, Ehrlich HP. Dupuytren’s disease: physiologic changes in nodule and cord fibroblasts through aging in vitro. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jul. 110(1):187-93; discussion 194-6. [Medline].

Sammarco GJ, Mangone PG. Classification and treatment of plantar fibromatosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Jul. 21(7):563-9. [Medline].

Fetsch JF, Laskin WB, Miettinen M. Palmar-plantar fibromatosis in children and preadolescents: a clinicopathologic study of 56 cases with newly recognized demographics and extended follow-up information. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Aug. 29(8):1095-105. [Medline].

Peimer CA, Blazar P, Coleman S, et al. Dupuytren Contracture Recurrence Following Treatment with Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CORDLESS Study): 3-Year Data. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jan. 38:12-22. [Medline].

Robbins SL, Cotran RS. Pocket Companion to Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1999.

Gelfand JM, Mirza N, Kantor J, et al. Nodular fasciitis. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Jun. 137(6):719-21. [Medline].

Nishi SP, Brey NV, Sanchez RL. Dermal nodular fasciitis: three case reports of the head and neck and literature review. J Cutan Pathol. 2006 May. 33(5):378-82. [Medline].

Dahl I, Akerman M. Nodular fasciitis a correlative cytologic and histologic study of 13 cases. Acta Cytol. 1981 May-Jun. 25(3):215-23. [Medline].

Wakely PE Jr, Geisinger KR, Cappellari JO, Silverman JF, Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration cytopathology of soft tissue: chondromyxoid and myxoid lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 1995 Mar. 12(2):101-5. [Medline].

Stanley MW, Skoog L, Tani EM, Horwitz CA. Nodular fasciitis: spontaneous resolution following diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 1993. 9(3):322-4. [Medline].

Powers CN, Berardo MD, Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: pitfalls in the diagnosis of spindle-cell lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 1994. 10(3):232-40; discussion 241. [Medline].

Bernstein KE, Lattes R. Nodular (pseudosarcomatous) fasciitis, a nonrecurrent lesion: clinicopathologic study of 134 cases. Cancer. 1982 Apr 15. 49(8):1668-78. [Medline].

Saqi A, Nassar A, Baloch Z. Nodular fasciitis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Jun. 26(6):407-8. [Medline].

Graham BS, Barrett TL, Goltz RW. Nodular fasciitis: response to intralesional corticosteroids. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Mar. 40(3):490-2. [Medline].

Chen TC, Kuo T, Chan HL. Dermatofibroma is a clonal proliferative disease. J Cutan Pathol. 2000 Jan. 27(1):36-9. [Medline].

Calonje E, Mentzel T, Fletcher CD. Cellular benign fibrous histiocytoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 74 cases of a distinctive variant of cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma with frequent recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Jul. 18(7):668-76. [Medline].

Ding J, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous areas. A clinicopathologic study of nine cases and a comparison with allied tumors. Cancer. 1989 Aug 1. 64(3):721-9. [Medline].

Rockley PF, Robinson JK, Magid M, Goldblatt D. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp: a series of cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989 Aug. 21(2 Pt 1):278-83. [Medline].

Shindo Y, Akiyama J, Takase Y. Tissue culture study of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Dermatol. 1988 Jun. 15(3):220-3. [Medline].

Lautier R, Wolff HH, Jones RE. An immunohistochemical study of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans supports its fibroblastic character and contradicts neuroectodermal or histiocytic components. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990 Feb. 12(1):25-30. [Medline].

Bourlond A, Marcoux C. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: ultrastructural investigation. Dermatology. 1992. 185(4):291-5. [Medline].

Altman DA, Nickoloff BJ, Fivenson DP. Differential expression of factor XIIIa and CD34 in cutaneous mesenchymal tumors. J Cutan Pathol. 1993 Apr. 20(2):154-8. [Medline].

Cohen PR, Rapini RP, Farhood AI. Expression of the human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 in vascular and spindle cell tumors. J Cutan Pathol. 1993 Feb. 20(1):15-20. [Medline].

Kutzner H. Expression of the human progenitor cell antigen CD34 (HPCA-1) distinguishes dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans from fibrous histiocytoma in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993 Apr. 28(4):613-7. [Medline].

Pedeutour F, Simon MP, Minoletti F, et al. Ring 22 chromosomes in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans are low-level amplifiers of chromosome 17 and 22 sequences. Cancer Res. 1995 Jun 1. 55(11):2400-3. [Medline].

Pedeutour F, Simon MP, Minoletti F, et al. Translocation, t(17;22)(q22;q13), in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a new tumor-associated chromosome rearrangement. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996. 72(2-3):171-4. [Medline].

Simon MP, Pedeutour F, Sirvent N, et al. Deregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor B-chain gene via fusion with collagen gene COL1A1 in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant-cell fibroblastoma. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan. 15(1):95-8. [Medline].

Simon MP, Navarro M, Roux D, Pouyssegur J. Structural and functional analysis of a chimeric protein COL1A1-PDGFB generated by the translocation t(17;22)(q22;q13.1) in Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DP). Oncogene. 2001 May 24. 20(23):2965-75. [Medline].

Nishio J, Iwasaki H, Ohjimi Y, et al. Overrepresentation of 17q22-qter and 22q13 in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans but not in dermatofibroma: a comparative genomic hybridization study. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002 Jan 15. 132(2):102-8. [Medline].

O’Brien KP, Seroussi E, Dal Cin P, et al. Various regions within the alpha-helical domain of the COL1A1 gene are fused to the second exon of the PDGFB gene in dermatofibrosarcomas and giant-cell fibroblastomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1998 Oct. 23(2):187-93. [Medline].

Wang J, Hisaoka M, Shimajiri S, Morimitsu Y, Hashimoto H. Detection of COL1A1-PDGFB fusion transcripts in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1999 Sep. 8(3):113-9. [Medline].

Mori S, Di Monta G, Marone U, Chiofalo MG, Caraco C. Half forehead reconstruction with a single rotational scalp flap for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treatment. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 May 6. 10(1):78. [Medline].

D’Andrea F, Vozza A, Brongo S, Di Girolamo F, Vozza G. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: experience with 14 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001 Sep. 15(5):427-9. [Medline].

Sun LM, Wang CJ, Huang CC, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: treatment results of 35 cases. Radiother Oncol. 2000 Nov. 57(2):175-81. [Medline].

Greco A, Roccato E, Miranda C, Cleris L, Formelli F, Pierotti MA. Growth-inhibitory effect of STI571 on cells transformed by the COL1A1/PDGFB rearrangement. Int J Cancer. 2001 May 1. 92(3):354-60. [Medline].

Sjoblom T, Shimizu A, O’Brien KP, et al. Growth inhibition of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans tumors by the platelet-derived growth factor receptor antagonist STI571 through induction of apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2001 Aug 1. 61(15):5778-83. [Medline].

Scheinfeld N. A comprehensive review of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) for dermatological diseases. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006 Feb. 5(2):117-22. [Medline].

Salam GA. Lipoma excision. Am Fam Physician. 2002 Mar 1. 65(5):901-4. [Medline].

Enzinger FM, Harvey DA. Spindle cell lipoma. Cancer. 1975 Nov. 36(5):1852-9. [Medline].

Shmookler BM, Enzinger FM. Pleomorphic lipoma: a benign tumor simulating liposarcoma. A clinicopathologic analysis of 48 cases. Cancer. 1981 Jan 1. 47(1):126-33. [Medline].

Castleberry RP, Kelly DR, Wilson ER, Cain WS, Salter MR. Childhood liposarcoma. Report of a case and review of the literature. Cancer. 1984 Aug 1. 54(3):579-84. [Medline].

Crozat A, Aman P, Mandahl N, Ron D. Fusion of CHOP to a novel RNA-binding protein in human myxoid liposarcoma. Nature. 1993 Jun 17. 363(6430):640-4. [Medline].

Malerba M, Doglietto GB, Pacelli F, et al. Primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: results of aggressive surgical treatment. World J Surg. 1999 Jul. 23(7):670-5. [Medline].

Rozental TD, Khoury LD, Donthineni-Rao R, Lackman RD. Atypical lipomatous masses of the extremities: outcome of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop. 2002 May. (398):203-11. [Medline].

Goss G, Demetri G. Medical management of unresectable, recurrent low-grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma: integration of cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic therapies into multimodality care. Surg Oncol. 2000 Aug. 9(2):53-9. [Medline].

Fanburg-Smith JC, Furlong MA, Childers EL. Liposarcoma of the oral and salivary gland region: a clinicopathologic study of 18 cases with emphasis on specific sites, morphologic subtypes, and clinical outcome. Mod Pathol. 2002 Oct. 15(10):1020-31. [Medline].

Yokouchi J, Negishi Y, Abe K, Shirasawa K, Mernyei M. Radiotherapy for liposarcoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Nov. 79(2):315-7. [Medline].

Iezzi G, Rubini C, Fioroni M, Piattelli A. Sebaceous adenoma of the cheek. Oral Oncol. 2002 Jan. 38(1):111-3. [Medline].

Troy JL, Ackerman AB. Sebaceoma. A distinctive benign neoplasm of adnexal epithelium differentiating toward sebaceous cells. Am J Dermatopathol. 1984 Feb. 6(1):7-13. [Medline].

Steffen C, Ackerman AB. Neoplasms with sebaceous differentiation. Philadelphia: Lee and Febiger, 1994.

Nelson BR, Hamlet KR, Gillard M, Railan D, Johnson TM. Sebaceous carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995 Jul. 33(1):1-15; quiz 16-8. [Medline].

Chee SP, Goh SH. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids: a review of six cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1996 Mar. 25(2):273-8. [Medline].

Kawamoto M, Fukuda Y, Kamoi S, Sugisaki Y, Yamanaka N. Sebaceous carcinoma of the vulva. Pathol Int. 1995 Oct. 45(10):767-73. [Medline].

Carlson JW, McGlennen RC, Gomez R, Longbella C, Carter J, Carson LF. Sebaceous carcinoma of the vulva: a case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Mar. 60(3):489-91. [Medline].

Snow SN, Larson PO, Lucarelli MJ, Lemke BN, Madjar DD. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids treated by mohs micrographic surgery: report of nine cases with review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Jul. 28(7):623-31. [Medline].

Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB. Treatment options and future prospects for the management of eyelid malignancies: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2001 Nov. 108(11):2088-98; quiz 2099-100, 2121. [Medline].

Yen MT, Tse DT, Wu X, Wolfson AH. Radiation therapy for local control of eyelid sebaceous cell carcinoma: report of two cases and review of the literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 May. 16(3):211-5. [Medline].

Vang R, Cohen PR. Ectopic hidradenoma papilliferum: a case report and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Jul. 41(1):115-8. [Medline].

Virgili A, Marzola A, Corazza M. Vulvar hidradenoma papilliferum. A review of 10.5 years’ experience. J Reprod Med. 2000 Aug. 45(8):616-8. [Medline].

Mehta NJ, Torno R, Sorra T. Extramammary Paget’s disease. South Med J. 2000 Jul. 93(7):713-5. [Medline].

Milne JA, MacKie RM, eds. Milne’s Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 1984.

Foschini MP, Eusebi V. Divergent differentiation in endocrine and nonendocrine tumors of the skin. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000 May. 17(2):162-8. [Medline].

Png JC, Tung KH, Wong YE, Mokal N, Rajagopalan R, Chong PY. Extramammary Paget’s disease: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995 Jul. 24(4):636-9. [Medline].

Belardi MG, Maglione MA, Vighi S, di Paola GR. Syringoma of the vulva. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1994 Dec. 39(12):957-9. [Medline].

Soler-Carrillo J, Estrach T, Mascaro JM. Eruptive syringoma: 27 new cases and review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001 May. 15(3):242-6. [Medline].

Goyal S, Martins CR. Multiple syringomas on the abdomen, thighs, and groin. Cutis. 2000 Oct. 66(4):259-62. [Medline].

McMeekin TW, Baerg RH, Snyder AJ, Ishibashi PL. Eccrine poroma. Review of the literature and case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1988 Jan. 78(1):43-6. [Medline].

Harvell JD, Kerschmann RL, LeBoit PE. Eccrine or apocrine poroma? Six poromas with divergent adnexal differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996 Feb. 18(1):1-9. [Medline].

Forman WR, Streigold H. Eccrine poroma: review of the literature and case reports. J Foot Surg. 1982. 21(4):278-80. [Medline].

Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H. Eccrine adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1983 Feb. 119(2):104-14. [Medline].

Snow SN, Reizner GT. Eccrine porocarcinoma of the face. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 Aug. 27(2 Pt 2):306-11. [Medline].

Wittenberg GP, Robertson DB, Solomon AR, Washington CV. Eccrine porocarcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: A report of five cases. Dermatol Surg. 1999 Nov. 25(11):911-3. [Medline].

Barzi AS, Ruggeri S, Recchia F, Bertoldi I. Malignant metastatic eccrine poroma. Proposal for a new therapeutic protocol. Dermatol Surg. 1997 Apr. 23(4):267-72. [Medline].

Wong TY, Suster S, Nogita T, Duncan LM, Dickersin RG, Mihm MC Jr. Clear cell eccrine carcinomas of the skin. A clinicopathologic study of nine patients. Cancer. 1994 Mar 15. 73(6):1631-43. [Medline].

Touma D, Laporte M, Goossens A, Ledoux M. Malignant clear cell hidradenoma. Dermatology. 1993. 186(4):284-6. [Medline].

Weber PJ, Hevia O, Gretzula JC, Rabinovitz HC. Primary mucinous carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988 Feb. 14(2):170-2. [Medline].

Fukamizu H, Tomita K, Inoue K, Takigawa M. Primary mucinous carcinoma of the skin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993 Jul. 19(7):625-8. [Medline].

Werner MS, Hornblass A, Sassoon J, Harrison W. Mucinous eccrine carcinoma of the eyelid. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Mar. 12(1):58-60. [Medline].

Sudesh R, Siddique S, Pace L. Primary eyelid mucinous adenocarcinoma of eccrine origin. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999 May. 30(5):394-5. [Medline].

Dutta M, Ghatak S, Sarkar R, et al. Perforating pilomatricoma presenting as an ulcer in the helix of the pinna. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2014 Nov 20. [Medline].

Scheinfeld NS. Pilomatrical carcinoma: A case in a patient with HIV and hepatitis C. Dermatology Online Journal. 2008. 14(1):4. [Full Text].

Alam M. Management of Merkel cell carcinoma: What we know. Arch Dermatol. 2006 Jun. 142(6):771-4. [Medline].

Attili S, Attili VR. Keratoacanthoma centrifugum marginatum arising in vitiligo: a case report. Dermatol Online J. 2006. 12(2):18. [Medline].

Bhatia N. Imiquimod as a possible treatment for keratoacanthoma. J Drugs Dermatol. 2004 Jan-Feb. 3(1):71-4. [Medline].

Burns SJ, Foss AJ, Butler TK. Outcome of periocular sebaceous gland carcinoma. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Sep. 21(5):353-5. [Medline].

Chang CJ. Combining the CO2 laser and the endoscope to remove soft tissue masses from the forehead area. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005 Oct. 23(5):509-12. [Medline].

Clausen OP, Aass HC, Beigi M, et al. Are keratoacanthomas variants of squamous cell carcinomas? A comparison of chromosomal aberrations by comparative genomic hybridization. J Invest Dermatol. 2006 Oct. 126(10):2308-15. [Medline].

Cordova A, Tripoli M, Corradino B, Napoli P, Moschella F. Dupuytren’s contracture: an update of biomolecular aspects and therapeutic perspectives. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2005 Dec. 30(6):557-62. [Medline].

Gupta SG, Wang LC, Penas PF. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation and treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: The Dana-Farber experience and meta-analysis of the literature. Arch Dermatol. 2006 Jun. 142(6):685-90. [Medline].

Katona TM, Ravis SM, Moores WB. Expression of Androgen Receptor by Fibroepithelioma of Pinkus-Evidence Supporting Classification as a Basal Cell Carcinoma Variant. Am J Dermatopathol. 2006 Jun. 28(3):230. [Medline].

Kytola S, Nord B, Elder EE, et al. Alterations of the SDHD gene locus in midgut carcinoids, Merkel cell carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, and abdominal paragangliomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002 Jul. 34(3):325-32. [Medline].

Lewis KG, Weinstock MA, Weaver AL. Adjuvant local irradiation for Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 2006 Jun. 142(6):693-700. [Medline].

Martorell EA, Murray PM, Peterson JJ, Menke DM, Calamia KT. Palmar fasciitis and arthritis syndrome associated with metastatic ovarian carcinoma: a report of four cases. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2004 Jul. 29(4):654-60. [Medline].

Navi D, Huntley A. Imiquimod 5 percent cream and the treatment of cutaneous malignancy. Dermatol Online J. 2004. 10(1):4. [Medline].

Nishizawa A, Nakanishi Y, Sasajima Y. Muir-torre syndrome with intriguing squamous lesions: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2006 Feb. 28(1):56-9. [Medline].

Vidal VP, Ortonne N, Schedl A. SOX9 expression is a general marker of basal cell carcinoma and adnexal-related neoplasms. J Cutan Pathol. 2008 Apr. 4:373-9. [Medline].

Noah S Scheinfeld, JD, MD, FAAD Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Weil Cornell Medical College; Consulting Staff, Department of Dermatology, St Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary; Assistant Attending Dermatologist, New York Presbyterian Hospital; Assistant Attending Dermatologist, Lenox Hill Hospital, North Shore-LIJ Health System; Private Practice

Noah S Scheinfeld, JD, MD, FAAD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Marc S Zimbler, MD, FACS Director of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Director of Residency Education, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center

Marc S Zimbler, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Shahin Javaheri, MD Chief, Department of Plastic Surgery, Martinez Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic; Consulting Staff, Advanced Aesthetic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Shahin Javaheri, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Wayne Karl Stadelmann, MD Stadelmann Plastic Surgery, PC

Wayne Karl Stadelmann, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, New Hampshire Medical Society, Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons, Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Gregory Gary Caputy, MD, PhD, FICS Wound Healing Consultant, Advantage Surgical and Wound Care

Gregory Gary Caputy, MD, PhD, FICS is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, International College of Surgeons, International College of Surgeons US Section, Wound Healing Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dennis P Orgill, MD, PhD Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Assistant in Surgery (Plastic Surgery), Boston Children’s Hospital

Dennis P Orgill, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association of Academic Chairmen in Plastic Surgery, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society, Wound Healing Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Integra LifeSciences, Inc for consulting; Received consulting fee from Integra LifeSciences, Inc. for program and training services agreement; Received grant/research funds from Integra LifeSciences, Inc. for clinical research; Received grant/research funds from KCI for basic science research; Received grant/research funds from KCI for clinical research; Received consulting fee from DSM for consulting; Received consulting fee from Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundatio.

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author Eugene Koh, PhD, to the development and writing of this article.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Rare Appendageal Tumors

Research & References of Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Rare Appendageal Tumors|A&C Accounting And Tax Services