Meningiomas Pathology 

Meningiomas Pathology 

No Results

No Results


Meningioma comprises about one fourth of all primary tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). It is the most common primary intracranial neoplasm and the most diversified in histologic patterns among all primary tumors of the CNS. Meningiomas, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), are “meningothelial (arachnoid) cell neoplasms, typically attached to the inner surface of the dura mater,” and these tumors fall into WHO grades I, II, and III. [1]

Meningothelial (arachnoidal) cells are believed to be the cell of origin of meningiomas. Based on studies in birds, the telencephalic leptomeninges arise from the neural crest (neuroectoderm) and the posterior brain, and the spinal cord arises from the mesoderm. [2] The arachnoid cells have several proposed functions, including acting as a structural barrier with cellular wrapping/ensheathing, acting as a conduit for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage/absorption into dural sinuses/veins (arachnoid villi), epithelial-like/secretory functions, monocytelike functions, trophic support and byproduct detoxification for glial and neuronal cells, and participation in reactive/reparative processes. [3]

The histologic patterns and biologic spectrum of meningiomas partially reflect the aforementioned biologic functions and embryogenesis. Both non-neoplastic meningothelial cells and meningiomas possess mixed features of epithelial and mesenchymal cells. In meningiomas, one feature may be dominant over the other, and this phenomenon partly contributes to the rich diversification of histologic patterns in these tumors.

Although some of the observed variants, such as chondroid meningiomas, clear-cell meningiomas, papillary meningiomas, and rhabdoid meningiomas, are associated with unfavorable prognoses, the other histologic patterns are not indicators of unfavorable biologic behavior. Some of the uncommon histologic patterns, such as the lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma, may raise concern for lymphoproliferative diseases. Anaplastic meningiomas often shed most of the obvious features of meningiomas, and their diagnosis may be difficult.

With all the above features, it is not difficult to imagine that some meningiomas can be true imposters, histologically mimicking other entities. Although the diagnosis is often straightforward, it can also be challenging.

In the United States, meningiomas comprise about 32% of all primary intracranial tumors, [4] with an annual incidence of 5.2 per 100,000 population. [4] These tumors are twice as common in women, and there is a regional variation. The overall incidence of meningioma in Norway is 1.5 per 100,000 population among men and 2.8 in women. [5] In comparison, the incidence in Italy is 13 per 100,000 population. [6] Patients with multiple meningiomas generally comprise less than 10% of cases. Most meningiomas are benign. In general, atypical meningiomas and anaplastic meningiomas comprise less than 10% of all meningiomas. [1]

Meningioma is essentially a tumor of adulthood, with a peak incidence in the sixth decade of life. [1] There is a definite predilection for women, with an average male-to-female ratio of 1:2.2. [4] Tumors arising in the spinal cord have a distinctly high incidence in women. Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, however, show a male predominance. [7] Childhood meningiomas occur more often in males. [8, 9] Meningiomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) tend to occur in younger individuals and with equal distribution between males and females.

With the exception that papillary meningiomas are more common in children, meningiomas are rather uncommon in children and almost never occur in infants. When these tumors occur in children, however, they are more often infratentorial, intraventricular, or intraparenchymal than in adults. They also tend to be more aggressive, with an increased frequency of recurrence. [10, 11, 12] Up to 25% of childhood cases of meningiomas are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or NF2. Tumors associated with NF2 may also have a more aggressive course. [11]

With the close resemblance between meningiomas and meningothelial cells, these cells are believed to be the cell of origin of meningiomas. This would also explain the high incidence of meningiomas around the sagittal sinus, which has a high concentration of meningothelial cells.

Although meningiomas commonly arise in locations where meningothelial cells are found, the embryonic origin of intraventricular and pulmonary meningiomas are intriguing. Intraventricular meningiomas probably arise from the meningothelial cells of the tela choroidea, where there is an arachnoidal invagination into the stromal base of the choroid plexus. During early embryonic development, the tela choroidea represents a portion of the pia and, together with the adjacent ependyma, forms the roof of the diencephalon. Minute meningothelial pulmonary nodules (MMPNs) [24, 25] are small perivascular nodules that are histologically and ultrastructurally identical to meningothelial cells of the CNS. These nodules probably represent the origin of primary meningiomas in the lung. Developmental lesions such as heterotopia of meningothelial cells in the scalp are believed to be the origin of meningiomas under the scalp and skin of the head. [26]

Similar to other tumors, the risk factors for the development of meningiomas can be divided into those with clearly defined genetic etiology and those that are attributed to environmental and other nongenetic factors. The etiology of most meningiomas, however, remains unclear.

As noted above, meningiomas are more common in women, and the female-to-male ratio has increased over the past several decades. [5, 27] Rapid growth of meningiomas in pregnant women has also been well documented. [28, 29] These increases suggest that the more widespread use of hormonal contraceptives may contribute to the tumorigenesis of meningiomas. In tumors obtained from the first operation, 88%, 40%, and 39% of meningiomas are positive for progesterone, estrogen, and androgen receptors, respectively. WHO grade I meningiomas have been reported to have significantly higher incidences of estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors than higher-grade meningiomas. However, differences in sex hormone receptor expression alone may not explain the observed increase in incidence in women. [30]

NF2 gene (merlin) on chromosome 22 [31] and the related cytoskeleton element gene DAL-1/4.1B (EPB41L3) [32, 33] on chromosome 18 are the two genes known to be associated with meningiomas. Genetically, meningiomas can be subdivided into 3 major genetic groups. The sporadic type, the familial type not related to NF2, and the familial type related to NF2. The sporadic type and familial types not related to NF2 may have different genetic mechanisms. [34, 35] There is a strong relationship between NF2 and the development of both meningiomas and meningioangiomatosis. [31, 36] These patients often develop multiple meningiomas. In contrast, patients with NF1 are not at an increased risk for the development of meningiomas.

Radiation at low, moderate, and high doses is a well-described risk factor for the development of meningiomas. [37, 38, 39] The implicated radiation exposure range spans from dental radiography, low-dose irradiation to the scalp for tinea capitis, radiation therapy for tumors in the head and neck region, and exposure to atomic explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The mean interval for tumor development is 35, 26, and 19-24 years, respectively. [37] Radiation-induced meningiomas tend to occur in younger patients and are more likely to be atypical or aggressive, multifocal, and highly proliferative. [40, 41, 42]

Meningiomas are most commonly dural-based tumors in the brain and, less commonly, the spinal cord. Rare cases occur as intraventricular and pulmonary tumors. Most meningiomas are intracranial extra-axial tumors. About half of these tumors occur in the falcine and parasagittal locations, [17, 43, 19] and they are often firmly affixed to the sagittal sinus. The majority of the remainder occur in the skull base. Posterior fossa and, in particular, intraventricular meningiomas are relatively uncommon. However, meningiomas in children are more often infratentorial, intraventricular, or intraparenchymal than those in adults. Up to 25% of childhood cases of meningiomas are associated with NF2. [8, 11]

Most of the spinal meningiomas are firmly affixed to the dura, subdural and laterally situated in close relationship with the spinal nerve roots. The thoracic spine is the most common site, followed by the cervical spine. Meningiomas are rarely seen in the lumbar region. There is a striking female predominance in spinal meningiomas.

Meningiomas outside the CNS have been described in multiple areas, including the scalp [44] and skin and connective tissue covering the head and neck, [26] lung, [45, 46] mediastinum, [47] peripheral nerve plexus and ganglion, [48] salivary gland, [46] mandible, and other odd locations. Primary meningiomas arising in the bone are rare and must be differentiated from meningioma with osseous invasion.

Meningiomas are slow-growing tumors, and smaller ones often remain asymptomatic throughout life. For the larger and symptomatic tumors, symptoms result from local compression and peritumoral edema. Headache and newly onset seizures are the most common initial manifestations. For the rare tumors that arise in the ventricles, hydrocephalus is often part of the clinical picture. [13] The local manifestations result from local compression and irritation of the brain and spinal cord, which lead to focal neurologic symptoms and signs.

Tumors that arise in the cranial base have a strong tendency to invade the surrounding osseous and nonosseous tissue, and they can be surgically challenging. [14, 15] Invasion of the cranial base and adjacent structures could cause a spectrum of manifestations, ranging from cranial nerve palsy, symptoms related to involvement of the sinuses and the orbit, [16] dental complaints, [17] and masses in the forehead. [18] Cranial base meningiomas are more likely to recur, but this probably reflects the difficulty in total surgical resection rather than the biologic nature of these tumors. [19] Tumors in the anterior visual pathway, such as along the optic nerve, are more likely to recur. [19] Extracranial meningiomas can also be seen in the sinonasal tract [20, 21] and should be distinguished from extensions from intracranial primaries.

The 5-year recurrence rates of meningiomas, atypical meningiomas, and anaplastic meningiomas are 3%, 38%-40%, and 78%, respectively. [7, 22] The overall 5-year survival rates for WHO grade I, II, and III meningiomas are approximately 95%, 80%, and 20%, respectively. [1] In one study, the median survival of patients with anaplastic meningioma was less than 2 years. [23] Gross total resection appears to be one of the most significant factors for favorable prognosis. [19]

Most, but not all, meningiomas are hyperdense on CT scans, and about a quarter of all cases demonstrate calcifications. Occasionally, meningiomas invade the cranial vault and cause characteristic hyperostosis. Large meningiomas may mold the overlying bone.

Typically, meningiomas are almost isodense with the gray matter on T1-weighted MRIs (see image below). These tumors vary from being hypointense to hyperintense on T2-weighed images.

Contrast-enhanced MRI is the most sensitive method for detecting meningiomas. Meningiomas enhance strongly and often homogeneously. About half of patients have an area of dural enhancement, or so-called “dural tail.” Such enhancement is common in all dural-based processes and is not entirely specific for meningiomas. Histologically, the dural tails may be composed entirely of hypervascular, presumably reactive tissue, but not meningioma tumor cells.

On T2-weighted MRI, a crest of CSF, so-called “CSF crest” (see image below) is often seen around the tumor. The presence of the crest is a good indicator of the extra-axial location of these tumors.

Meningiomas often attach to, encase, or compress adjacent arteries and sinuses. The nature of tumor relationship with the regional vasculature is an important surgical consideration and is best assessed with MRI. Meningiomas are also typically associated with peritumoral edema that is well demonstrated on fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) images or T2-weighted MRIs. [48] Occasionally, such edema may be disproportionally large relative to the size of the tumor and may suggest an invasive tumor or a metastatic carcinoma or melanoma. Secretory meningiomas are well known for inducing a disproportionately large amount of peritumoral edema.

Benign meningiomas are round, bosselated, or lobulated well-demarcated dural-based nodules (see image below). [1] The great majority of them are dural based. Depending on their collagen content, the consistency of these tumors ranges from rubbery to firm.

Atypical meningiomas and anaplastic meningiomas are usually larger. The cut surfaces of benign meningiomas are usually granular to homogeneous. Cases with a substantial amount of psammoma bodies are gritty to the knife cut. Yellow areas resulting from the accumulation of lipid-rich cells may be present. Ossifications may occur. Cysts and spontaneous hemorrhages are uncommon. Necrosis may be present in high-grade tumors. The size of meningiomas varies significantly and ranges from a few millimeters to several centimeters in size. The smallest ones are often asymptomatic, but they can be detected with powerful MRI.

Benign meningiomas can be easily separated from the underlying brain parenchyma without disruption of the cortex. This feature is well reflected by the well-circumscribed appearance and the CSF crest on imaging. The underlying cortex is often compressed and appears gliotic. When invasion is present, the neurosurgeon may have difficulty in establishing a clear cleavage plane between the tumor and the underlying cortex. In contrast, cranial-base meningiomas often invade the surrounding osseous and fibrous structures. Meningiomas that involve the orbit may represent primary tumors arising within the orbit, as well as intracranial meningiomas with extension into the orbit.

En plaque meningiomas refer to tumors with a carpetlike growth pattern along the dura that lead to dural thickening closely apposed to the inner surface of the overlying skull. This pattern is most common in the sphenoid wing and other cranial base locations. Owing to their location and growth pattern, manifestations often refer to the ophthalmic and cranial nerves. [16] En plaque meningiomas should be distinguished from meningioangiomatosis, a task that is not always easy on MRIs.

The current (2007) WHO grading scheme for meningiomas [1] has largely adopted the criteria based on the clinicopathologic data from 2 large series [22, 23] ; the validity of these criteria has been subsequently confirmed by 2 other groups. [50, 51]

In contrast to many other tumors, one of the unique features in meningiomas is that invasion of bone, vascular structures, dura, dural sinus, and paranasal sinuses are not considered evidence of malignancy or aggressiveness. However, invasion of brain parenchyma is considered an indicator of aggressive behavior.

In the WHO grading system, meningiomas fall into WHO grades I-III. WHO grade I tumors comprise about 80% of all meningiomas. In comparison to WHO grade I tumors, atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas have histologic features that indicate aggressive behavior, which include an increase in mitotic activity, brain invasion, and spontaneous necrosis. Atypical meningiomas comprise about 15%-20% of all meningiomas and carry a marked increase in local recurrence with reduced long-term survival. Cases with increased mitotic activity may not show impressive nuclear atypia. Careful search for mitotic activity and the mitotic count are important. An elevated mitotic count is defined as 4 or more mitoses per 10 consecutive high-powered fields (HPFs) (0.16 mm2), [22] regardless of whether the increase is focal or diffuse.

Although most histologic patterns do not reflect the tumor’s biologic potential, tumors with clear cell and chordoid histology are considered WHO grade II. Tumors with papillary and rhabdoid features are considered WHO grade III. In some cases, these features may be focal. There is a tendency for these aggressive components to become the dominant component in recurrent tumors.

WHO grade I meningiomas are defined by the following:

Histologic variant other than clear cell, chordoid, papillary, and rhabdoid

Lacks criteria of atypical and anaplastic meningioma

Any of the following 3 criteria are used for WHO grade II meningiomas:

Mitotic index of ≥4/10 HPFs*

At least 3 of the 5 following parameters: (1) sheeting architecture (loss of whorling and/or fascicles), (2) small cell formation (high nucleus-to-cytoplasmic [N/C] ratio), (3) macronucleoli, (4) hypercellularity, or (5) spontaneous necrosis (ie, not induced by embolization or radiation)

Brain invasion

* HPF is defined at 40X magnification of 0.16 mn2 or 0.452 mm in field diameter (as adapted from Meningiomas in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System [1] ).

Brain invasion refers to breaching of the pial barrier but not mere extension or growth of tumor along the Virchow-Robin space. Fingerlike extension of the tumor into the parenchyma is the classic observation. In areas with confluent invasion, immunohistochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may be needed to demonstrate entrapped gliotic parenchymal tissue. In the past, brain invasion was recognized as a definitive sign of malignancy for meningiomas. In the current WHO criteria, however, meningiomas that appear benign but with brain invasion are considered WHO grade II (atypical) rather than WHO grade III.

Genuine extracranial metastasis or subarachnoid spread is exceptional and most likely originates from anaplastic meningiomas. So-called “benign metastasizing meningioma” represents a stable or slowly growing metastasis from a meningioma exhibiting a typical low-grade histology. In such cases, the metastases are not regarded as evidence of malignancy. They are most often found in the lung and should be distinguished from the equally rare primary pulmonary meningiomas. [52, 53]

Either of the following 2 criteria is used for WHO grade III meningiomas:

Mitotic index ≥20/HPF*

Frank anaplasia (sarcoma, carcinoma, or melanomalike histology)

* HPF is defined at 40X magnification of 0.16 mn2 or 0.452 mm in field diameter (as adapted from Meningiomas in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System [1] ).

Meningioma is perhaps the primary neuroepithelial tumor with the widest diversification in histologic pattern. Some of these patterns may suggest a diagnosis other than meningioma, particularly when the biopsy sample is small and during intraoperative consultation. For example, secretory meningiomas can mimic metastatic adenocarcinoma, and lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningiomas may mimic a lymphoproliferative disorder. Some of these patterns carry significant histologic predictive values, whereas the others do not.

It is not common for a meningioma to have a homogeneous histology in all parts of the tumor. This feature is particularly important in the diagnosis of meningiomas with these troublesome patterns and in anaplastic meningiomas, as small areas with typical features of meningioma may be present somewhere on the slides, waiting to be discovered.

Components indicative of aggressive behavior, such as chordoid changes, may be focally present initially, but these components may become the dominant component on recurrent tumors and should be identified on the initial specimen. Identification of these focal patterns is important.

Histologic patterns recognized by WHO (as adapted from Meningiomas in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System [1] ) are reviewed in this section.

WHO grade I includes the following histologic patterns:

Meningothelial (syncytial) meningioma

Transitional (mixed) meningioma

Fibroblastic (fibrous) meningioma

Psammomatous meningioma

Angiomatous (vascular) meningioma

Microcystic meningioma

Secretory meningioma

Lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma

Metaplastic meningioma

WHO grade II includes the following histologic patterns:

Chordoid meningioma

Clear cell meningioma (intracranial)

Atypical meningioma

WHO grade III includes the following histologic patterns:

Papillary meningioma

Rhabdoid meningioma

Anaplastic (malignant) meningioma

The highlights of different patterns are summarized below. Other than atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, these patterns roughly fall into 2 major categories. In the first category, an additional histologic pattern such as a substantial amount of lymphoplasmacytic cells (lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma) or specific mesenchymal component (metaplastic meningioma) is present in addition to the classic meningioma component. These patterns (except chordoid meningiomas) are usually not associated with an unfavorable prognosis. In the second category, specific cytologic features of the tumor cells, such as clear cell changes (clear cell meningioma) or rhabdoid changes (rhabdoid meningioma), deviate from classic meningioma. Many of these tumors are associated with an unfavorable prognosis.

WHO grade I

Meningothelial (syncytial) meningioma histologic highlights are as follows:

Epithelioid, round to polygonal, with a moderate amount of amphophilic to eosinophilic cytoplasm

Cells arranged in lobules of cells or whorls

Syncytial appearance due to fuzzy intercellular border

Intranuclear clear vacuoles and intranuclear pseudoinclusions are common

Transitional (mixed) meningioma histologic highlights include the following:

Intermediate features between fibroblastic type or a mixture of both meningothelial and fibroblastic components

Meningothelial whorls are well developed

Psammoma bodies are common

Fibroblastic (fibrous) meningioma histologic highlights include the following:

Spindle cells with bland nuclei arranged in fascicles or storiform pattern

Collagen deposition

May be very fibrous

Diagnostic features that help in the diagnosis include classic nuclear features, meningothelial whorls, and psammoma bodies. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy are also helpful. The differential diagnoses include other low-grade fibrous tumors, such as solitary fibrous tumors.

Psammomatous meningiomas are particularly common in the spinal region of older women and in tumors that are being monitored for a long time before resection. Histologic highlights of these tumors are as follows:

Numerous meningothelial whorls with psammoma bodies at their centers

Psammoma bodies should comprise about half of the tumor for this diagnosis to be made [3]

Angiomatous (vascular) meningiomas may have disproportionally large peritumoral edema relative to the size of the tumor. Histologic highlights include the following:

The histologic picture is dominated by blood vessels with small- to medium-sized vascular channels; most of these vessels are small and with hyalinized walls (this hypervascular pattern would suggest a hemangioma)

Two histologic patterns, the microvascular and macrovascular types, have been identified [55]

This angiomatous pattern occurs commonly in combination with microcystic meningiomas

Degenerative nuclear atypia is common and can be striking, thus raising the concern for malignancy or aggressiveness; however, these tumors are benign

The differential diagnoses include vascular tumors, hemangioblastomas, and hemangiopericytomas.

Microcystic meningiomas may also have disproportionally large peritumoral edema relative to the size of the tumor. Histologic highlights are as follows:

The extracellular microcysts contain pale, eosinophilic mucinous fluid (see image below)

The tumor cells have thin, spidery cytoplasmic processes, which may suggest glioma when only small tissues are available or during the interpretation of frozen section diagnosis

Pleomorphic cells may be present and numerous, but they are not evidence for aggressive behavior

The differential diagnoses include hemangioblastomas, gliomas, and, less likely, low-grade metastatic carcinomas.

Secretory meningiomas may have disproportionally large peritumoral edema relative to the size of the tumor. In addition, these tumors may be associated with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in blood. Resection of the tumor would lead to a return of the CEA level to normal. Histologic highlights include the following:

Tumor cells with intracellular lumina containing eosinophilic (see the image below), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)–positive secretions

Although these secretory vacuoles are intracellular, they can be several times the size of the nuclei

These tumors have focal epithelial differentiation, particularly with cells containing the secretory vacuoles; these cells are positive for cytokeratin and CEA (see image below)

There may be a high number of mast cells

The differential diagnoses include metastatic, mucin-secreting adenocarcinomas.

Lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningiomas may rarely have systemic findings, such as polyclonal gammopathy and anemia. [54] Histologic highlights are as follows:

This is the least common histologic pattern for meningiomas

There is extensive, chronic inflammatory cell infiltration, which obscures the meningothelial component; these inflammatory cells may represent a brisk inflammatory response to the tumor

Plasma cells with Russell bodies may be present

The differential diagnoses include Rosai-Dorfman disease (extranodal sinus histiocytosis), Castleman disease, inflammatory pseudotumor, and rheumatoid nodules; low-grade lymphomas; and meningitis and meningeal inflammatory changes secondary to lesions in the skull or adjacent structures.

Metaplastic meningioma histologic highlights include the following:

Metaplastic components, singly or in combination, including bone, cartilage, myxoid area, and xanthomatous and lipomatous components are present; bone and cartilage are far more commonly found than other components; some of these are reactive changes or mere accumulation of lipids but not genuine metaplasia

When an osseous component is present, it should be distinguished from bone invasion

The metaplastic components can be focal or widespread, but classic meningothelial components are often found, and the diagnosis is usually not a challenge

In extreme cases with widespread metaplastic changes, the concern of a mesenchymal tumor may be raised as part of the differential diagnoses.

WHO grade II

Chordoid meningioma’s association with the systemic findings of Castleman syndrome, including polyclonal gammopathy and microcystic anemia, has been reported in children. [57, 58] These are usually large, dural-based, supratentorial tumors with a very high rate of recurrence following subtotal resection. [58] Histologic highlights are as follows:

The overall morphology mimics chordoma, featured by epithelioid cells with bubbly cytoplasm (see first image below) and an Alcian blue–positive myxoid stroma (see second image below)

This tumor is associated with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration that ranges in intensity from patchy to prominent

The proportion of chordoid component may increase in proportion in subsequent recurrences

Pure chordoid meningiomas are rare, and most of them are mixed with a variable amount of meningothelial component

The differential diagnoses include chordoma and chordoid glioma of the third ventricle. With chordomas, the location is helpful. Chordoid meningiomas are dural-based tumors that occur in a location where chordomas would not be expected. In addition, chordomas are positive for brachyury. [59, 60] Chordoid gliomas of the third ventricle are positive for GFAP.

Clear cell meningiomas have a predilection for the spinal cord and posterior fossa. Affected patients have a younger age of onset and an aggressive clinical course despite the typically bland histology. [56] Histologic highlights include the following:

Glycogen-rich cytoplasmic clearing but not extracellular secretory vacuoles best demonstrated by PAS with and without diastase digestion; this is an important feature that distinguishes these tumors from microcystic meningioma

The tumor is unique in being a pure clear cell tumor with subtle features of classic meningiomas in most cases

Dense stromal and perivascular blocky collagen deposition is present

The differential diagnoses include metastatic clear cell carcinoma, particularly renal cell carcinoma (clear cell meningiomas are negative for cytokeratin), and microcystic meningiomas.

The histologic highlights of atypical meningiomas are as follows:

When the tumor does not meet the diagnostic criteria of clear cell or chordoid meningioma, the histologic features should meet the criteria listed in WHO Histologic Grading of Meningiomas for the diagnosis of atypical meningioma, as listed above

Features of atypical changes can occur in any of the variants

WHO grade III

Papillary meningiomas are uncommon. The posterior fossa is a common site of predilection. These tumors have an increased frequency in young individuals and children, [61] and an aggressive clinical behavior and metastases to the lung is not uncommon. [62, 63] Histologic highlights include the following:

A perivascular arrangement of tumor cells is the dominant feature

The papillary or pseudopapillary growth pattern may dominate the histologic picture and results from dyscohesion of the tumor cells

These tumors often arise from more conventional meningiomas; the proportion of the papillary component may increase in subsequent recurrences

The differential diagnoses include ependymomas, astroblastomas, pituitary adenomas, hemangiopericytomas, and medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors.

Rhabdoid meningiomas are similar to many other rhabdoid tumors of adulthood in that this tumor is regarded as a pattern reflecting the malignant transformation of a meningioma. The demographics are similar to conventional meningiomas. The rhabdoid component may occur during recurrence. Histologic highlights are as follows:

The rhabdoid features can be very well recognized on cytologic preparations (see the image below)

Similar to other rhabdoid tumors, the rhabdoid cells have a discohesive growth pattern and an intracytoplasmic globular, eosinophilic inclusion that displaces the nuclei to the periphery; the nuclei have vesicular nucleoli and prominent nucleoli

Rhabdoid changes may be superimposed on a papillary meningioma background

Areas with conventional meningiomas are often present

The differential diagnoses include other primary or metastatic rhabdoid tumors, as well as atypical rhabdoid teratoid tumors (ATRTs). Rhabdoid meningiomas are rare in infants and children. ATRTs have a more diversified phenotypic immunohistochemical profile, including loss of expression of the HSNF5/SMARCB1/INI1 protein secondary to heterozygous or homozygous deletion of the INI1 gene. [64]

The histologic highlights of anaplastic meningioma include the following:

There are frank anaplastic changes, and the tumor may mimic metastatic carcinoma, melanoma, and sarcoma

Mitotic activity is ≥20 mitoses per HPF

Intraoperative cytologic preparations demonstrate helpful diagnostic features. Most meningiomas can be smeared out if an appropriate force is applied. For meningothelial and transitional meningiomas, the smears are usually composed of large clusters of epithelioid cells mixed with smaller clusters or individual cells. The degree of rubbery consistency depends heavily on the content of collagen. Fibroblastic meningiomas are a lot more difficult to generate a homogeneous smear than meningothelial or transitional meningiomas. Fibroblastic meningiomas usually yield cluster of spindle cells that tightly adhere to each other, but scattered single cells with epithelioid features are often present.

The scattered single cells typically give clues for the diagnosis of meningiomas. The nuclei are usually oval or slightly elongated and contain open chromatin (see image below).

For the grade I tumors, a prominent nucleoli should not be seen. A concern for grade II or III tumors, as well as nonmeningeal tumors such as metastatic carcinoma or melanoma, should be raised if prominent nucleoli are noted. Intranuclear pseudoinclusions (invagination of cytoplasm into the nucleus) and intranuclear clear vacuoles vary from scant to abundant. These nuclear features are typical but not unique to meningiomas.

The scattered single cells are usually epithelioid in appearance and in the shape of an elongated triangle with moderate amount of cytoplasm. To the eye of the author, these cells look like a veil being blown in the wind. Identification of definite meningothelial whorl formation (see first image below) is a clear help. Psammoma bodies are round, concentrically laminated, calcifications (see second image below) that are commonly seen.

Secretory meningiomas are featured by large, secretory vacuoles (see first image below), and rhabdoid meningiomas are featured by rhabdoid cells (see second image below). These cytologic features are well demonstrated in the cytologic preparations.

Meningothelial cells have features of epithelial and mesenchymal cells, and this mixed feature is well reflected in the histopathology of meningothelial (syncytial), transitional (mixed), and fibroblastic (fibrous) meningiomas. The meningothelial (syncytial) meningioma is perhaps the prototype of meningiomas and the most commonly encountered histologic pattern. In meningiomas with other uncommon histologic patterns, classic meningothelial areas may be focally present, and identification of these areas helps to confirm the diagnosis.

Meningothelial meningiomas are composed of lobules of meningothelial cells sometimes separated by thin fibrous septa. Sporadic psammoma bodies can be seen (see first image below). Meningothelial whorls are present but typically not as well formed as in transitional meningiomas. The intercellular border is typically fuzzy and poorly defined (see second image below). This feature reflects the interdigitating cytoplasmic border seen at the ultrastructural level. In fact, a well-defined cytoplasmic border in an otherwise typical meningioma raises the suspicion for a more aggressive behavior.

The nuclei are oval to elongated and typically without prominent nucleoli in low-grade cases. Clear intranuclear vacuoles as well as pseudonuclear inclusions are characteristic but not diagnostic nuclear features. Its abundance is rather variable (see image below).

At the other end of the spectrum, fibroblastic meningiomas are composed of fascicles of spindle cells mixed with a variable amount of collagen fibers. Overall features resemble a benign spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasm (see image below). Some of these tumors can be densely fibrotic. The nuclear features are helpful hints for the diagnosis, because the cell morphology is not particularly helpful. Pure fibroblastic meningiomas are rather uncommon, and areas with transitional and/or meningothelial components are often present and would help in confirming the diagnosis.

Transitional meningiomas are the intermediate version and are composed of areas with intermediate features between meningothelial and fibroblastic components (see first image below) as well as intermingled areas with distinct meningothelial and fibroblastic features. Meningothelial whorls are often well formed (see second image below).

Atypical meningiomas often do not possess impressive atypical nuclear changes. Increased mitotic activity can be seen independent of a significant increase in nuclear atypia (see first image below). In some atypical meningiomas with a high level of atypia, identification of intranuclear clear vacuoles and pseudoinclusions (see second image below) can help to confirm the diagnosis. Brain invasion can also be found independent of high-grade atypia (see third image below). Other features indicative of aggressive biologic potential for atypical meningiomas include loss of whorling and/or fascicles (sheeting of cells), small cell component, macronucleoli, hypercellularity, and spontaneous necrosis (see WHO Histologic Grading of Meningiomas).

Anaplastic meningiomas have high-grade anaplasia and high-mitotic activity (see WHO Histologic Grading of Meningiomas). These tumors may arise as de novo tumors or result from malignant progression of previously existing meningiomas. Because meningothelial cells have features of both epithelial and mesenchymal cells, it is not surprising to find that their high-grade tumors would span the histologic spectrum, resembling carcinoma at one end to sarcoma at the other. On first look, these tumors may not really suggest meningiomas but raise a consideration of a possible carcinoma, melanoma, or sarcoma. On closer scrutiny, histologic features of meningiomas may be found in some focal areas. Immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and genetic studies may be needed to confirm the diagnosis.

Proliferative markers determined by immunostaining for Ki-67 (MIB-1) or anti-phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3), as well as apoptotic index, have been shown to be correlated with the biologic behavior in meningiomas. In general, there is a high correlation between a high Ki-67 labeling index and histologic grade, but, owing to the differences in techniques used in different laboratories, the cutoff value for meningiomas, atypical meningiomas, and anaplastic meningiomas is not always reproducible. [23, 65, 66, 67, 68] Increased apoptotic index has also been correlated with increased biologic aggressiveness in meningiomas. [67]

Recently, a PHH3 antibody has been used to detect mitotic rates, which has led to some success in distinguishing WHO grade I and grade II meningiomas. [69, 70, 71]

Vimentin is typically diffusely and strongly positive in meningiomas. The most reliable marker is perhaps epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), in which about 50%-100% of the cases are positive. [15, 60, 72, 73, 74] The staining pattern, however, is often weak and patchy rather than a diffuse positivity (see image below).

Meningiomas, with the exception of secretory meningiomas, are usually negative for cytokeratins. Focally positive immunoreactivity for S100 can also be seen. [74] Other markers with certain success, but not of wide clinical application, include prostaglandin D synthase, [75] E-cadherin, [76] claudin-1, [77] desmosomal plaque components such as desmoplakin, [78] and connexins. [79]

Meningiomas are often positive for androgen, progesterone, and estrogen receptors. [80] Expression is equally common in males and females, and there is no difference among different histologic subtypes. There is a significant correlation between negative or low expression of progesterone-receptor status and high tumor vascularity with high Ki-67 labeling index. [65, 81]

The ultrastructural features for meningiomas are highly diagnostic. Regardless of the histologic variants or patterns, the tumor cells have interdigitating cytoplasmic membrane. Intercellular junctions are present (see image below). [82]

Monosomy 22 is a unique cytogenetic alteration. [83] Mutation and/or deletion of the NF2 gene on chromosome 22q12 is present in most NF2-associated meningiomas and about 50%-80% of sporadic meningiomas. The NF2 gene codes for merlin (schwannomin), and its normal function is poorly understood. This gene is critical in constituting the early tumorigenic event in the 2-hit model of tumor-suppressor inactivation proposed by Knudson. [84]

In general, solitary meningiomas are clonal tumors as per X-chromosome inactivation studies. [85] In one study, most meningiomas shared the same single mutation, and recurrent tumors had the same clonality as the primary tumor. [86] In multiple meningiomas, it has been shown that most of these tumors share the same NF2 gene mutation [87] and inactivation of the same copy of X-chromosome. [88] Dural spread and peritumoral implants may well be the mechanism in cases with multiple meningiomas. [89]

Various genetic alterations have been identified in the malignant progression of meningiomas and are summarized below (as adapted from Meningiomas in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System [1] ).

Benign meningioma (WHO grade I)

-22q (4%-70%)

NF2 mutation (30%-60%)

Loss of 4.1B expression (20%-50%)

Loss of TSLC1 expression (30%-50%)

PR (50%-90%)

EGFR, PDGFRB activation

Atypical meningioma (WHO grade II)

-1p (40%-75%)

-6q (30%)

-10 (30%-40%)

-14q (40%-60%)

-18q (40%)

+1q, 9q, 12q, 15q, 17q, 20q (30%-50% each)

Loss of TSLC1 expression (70%)

Loss of PR expression (60%-80%)

Telomerase/hTERT activation (60%-90%)

Notch, WNT, IGF, VEGF activation

Anaplastic meningioma (WHO grade III)

-1p (100%)

-6q (50%)

-9p21 (60-80%)

-10 (40-70%)

-14q (60-100%)

-18q (60-70%)

NDRG2 hypermethylation (70%)

Loss of TSLC1 expression (70%)

Loss of PR receptor (80-90%)

17q23 amplification (40%)

The diagnosis of classic, WHO grade I meningothelial, transitional, and fibroblastic meningiomas is usually straightforward. The higher-grade variants and meningiomas of the unusual patterns often pose a diagnostic challenge. Some of the more commonly encountered entities are discussed below.

Meningothelial hyperplasia refers to meningothelial proliferation over 10 cells thick and associated with an inciting event [92, 93] and is believed to be caused by reactive changes of meningothelial cells. Such hyperplasia is often prominent in optic nerve gliomas (see images below). In small biopsy specimens obtained during intraoperative consultation, these clusters may suggest meningiomas.

Meningioangiomatosis raises a strong suggestion of NF2, but sporadic cases can present. The initial presentation is usually seizures in a child or young adult. On imaging studies, these lesions may simulate an en plaque meningioma. Classically, this is a plaquelike leptomeningeal thickening that is firmly adhered to the cortex and is believed to be hamartomatous in nature.

Histologically, there is perivascular growth of spindle cells that often demonstrate features of meningothelial cells, including expression of EMA, psammoma bodies, and classic nuclear features of meningothelial cells. Coexisting meningiomas, with some of them presumably arising from the meningioangiomatosis, have been well described.

Schwannomalike cases may also present (meningoangio-neurilemmomatosis). In contrast to benign meningiomas that have a clear cleavage plane, the interface of meningioangiomatosis closely intermingles with the underlying cortex in which impressive gliosis is present. Entrapped neurons are often present.

With all these features, the diagnosis is often an enigma, particularly when the specimen is small. Meningioangiomatosis may be misinterpreted as a meningioma if meningothelial cells are prominent; as a glioma because of the overall hypercellularity and reactive gliosis; or a ganglion cell neoplasm, due to entrapment of preexisting neurons. A correct diagnosis depends largely on the recognition of the entity as an intracortical perivascular proliferation of meningothelial cells and fibroblasts. [90, 91] Correlation of clinical and imaging features are important.

Dural-based metastatic clear cell tumors with low-grade morphology such as metastatic renal cell carcinoma and prostatic carcinoma may closely mimic clear cell meningioma. Diffuse cytokeratin positivity is present in these tumors, and this contrasts with a mostly negative pattern in classic meningiomas. Specific markers such as CD10 for renal cell carcinoma, prostatic acidic protein, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are helpful for confirming the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and prostatic carcinoma, respectively. Neurocytoma may also mimic clear cell meningioma. Neurocytomas occur most commonly within the ventricle and are synaptophysin-positive.

Hemangioblastomas may mimic microcystic and clear cell meningiomas. Primary dural-based hemangioblastoma is rare, and these tumors are positive for inhibin. Renal cell carcinoma is also one of the few carcinomas that are positive both for vimentin and cytokeratin.

Solitary fibrous tumor may closely mimic the fibroblastic type of meningiomas. In the past, some of these tumors were termed “sclerotic meningiomas.” Solitary fibrous tumors are slow-growing spindle cell tumors that affect adults. Dural-based examples are rather uncommon.

Histologically, there is a great variation of the amount of collagen tissue. The tumor cells usually have bland or low-grade, elongated, cigar-shaped nuclei, and they often insinuate among collagen fibers. These features would suggest a fibroblastic meningioma.

Immunohistochemically, solitary fibrous tumors are positive for CD34 and Bcl-2 and negative for EMA (see images below). Faint positive CD34 immunoreactivity may be seen in meningiomas.

Schwannomas are common in the cerebellopontine angle and in the spinal nerve roots. On rare occasions, meningiomas may have a focal palisading arrangement that would suggest meningioma in these locations. Although uncommon, whorls can be seen in schwannomas.

Several features distinguish these 2 entities. The classic nuclear features of meningiomas are best recognized on cytologic preparations and are the first clues for the correct diagnosis. Schwannomas do not routinely contain collagen, and these tumors are strongly positive for S100; reticulin staining demonstrates deposition of reticulin fibers around the individual cells. In contrast, meningiomas are not strongly and diffusely positive for S100, and reticulin staining demonstrates nests of cells rather than pericellular reticulin fibers.

Although high-grade meningiomas may invade the brain and mimic a glioma, high-grade gliomas may also invade the leptomeninges and mimic meningiomas. Immunohistochemistry would demonstrate positivity for GFAP and S100 protein in the glioma component.

In the past, hemangiopericytomas were called angiomatous meningiomas. Hemangiopericytomas behave far more aggressively than low-grade meningiomas. In addition, hemangiopericytomas are hypercellular tumors with characteristic thin-walled branching, so-called “staghorn” blood vessels (see first image below). The tumor cells are rather monotonous in size, with large nuclei, and they often share a comparable level of atypia among different cells (see second image below). These cells lack the characteristic nuclear features of meningothelial cells, nor are meningothelial whorls found. Hemangiopericytomas are negative for EMA and may be positive for CD34. A reticulin stain would demonstrate deposition of reticulin among individual tumor cells.

Although anaplastic meningioma may mimic metastatic carcinomas, secretory meningiomas often suggest mucin-containing adenocarcinomas at intraoperative consultation. The exuberant edema associated with secretory meningiomas often suggests metastatic neoplasm on imaging studies. The large vacuoles would fuel this suspicion. Cytologically and histologically, the secretory vacuoles of secretory meningiomas are huge and are several times the size of the nuclei or even the cell (see the first 2 images below). In contrast, mucin-secreting adenocarcinomas rarely have their vacuoles 2-3 times the size of the nuclei (see the third image below). In addition, they contain bluish mucoid substance rather than the bright eosinophilic substance that are seen in secretory meningiomas.

Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Budka H, von Deiming A. Louis DN, Ohgaki Hiroko, Wiestler OD, and Cavenee WK. Meningioimas in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2007. 164-172.

Catala M. Embryonic and fetal development of structures associated with the cerebro-spinal fluid in man and other species. Part I: The ventricular system, meninges and choroid plexuses. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol. 1998. 46(3):153-69. [Medline].

Perry A. McLendon RE, Rosenblum MK, Bigner DD. Meningiomas in Russell and Rubinstein’s Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System. 7th Edition. Hodder Arnold; 2006. 427-474.

Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS). 2007-2008: Primary brain tumors in the United States. Statistical report: 2000-2004. Years of data collected. Available at Accessed: May 10, 2011.

Helseth A. Incidence and survival of intracranial meningioma patients in Norway 1963-1992. Neuroepidemiology. 1997. 16(2):53-9. [Medline].

Cordera S, Bottacchi E, D’Alessandro G, Machado D, De Gonda F, Corso G. Epidemiology of primary intracranial tumours in NW Italy, a population based study: stable incidence in the last two decades. J Neurol. 2002 Mar. 249(3):281-4. [Medline].

Jääskeläinen J, Haltia M, Servo A. Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: radiology, surgery, radiotherapy, and outcome. Surg Neurol. 1986 Mar. 25(3):233-42. [Medline].

Erdinçler P, Lena G, Sarioglu AC, Kuday C, Choux M. Intracranial meningiomas in children: review of 29 cases. Surg Neurol. 1998 Feb. 49(2):136-40; discussion 140-1. [Medline].

Menon G, Nair S, Sudhir J, Rao BR, Mathew A, Bahuleyan B. Childhood and adolescent meningiomas: a report of 38 cases and review of literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Mar. 151(3):239-44; discussion 244. [Medline].

Deen HG Jr, Scheithauer BW, Ebersold MJ. Clinical and pathological study of meningiomas of the first two decades of life. J Neurosurg. 1982 Mar. 56(3):317-22. [Medline].

Baumgartner JE, Sorenson JM. Meningioma in the pediatric population. J Neurooncol. 1996 Sep. 29(3):223-8. [Medline].

Perry A, Giannini C, Raghavan R, Scheithauer BW, Banerjee R, Margraf L, et al. Aggressive phenotypic and genotypic features in pediatric and NF2-associated meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 53 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001 Oct. 60(10):994-1003. [Medline].

Menon G, Nair S, Sudhir J, Rao R, Easwer HV, Krishnakumar K. Meningiomas of the lateral ventricle – a report of 15 cases. Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Jun. 23(3):297-303. [Medline].

Rao G, Klimo P Jr, Jensen RL, MacDonald JD, Couldwell WT. Surgical strategies for recurrent craniofacial meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2006 May. 58(5):874-80; discussion 874-80. [Medline].

Rushing EJ, Bouffard JP, McCall S, Olsen C, Mena H, Sandberg GD, et al. Primary Extracranial Meningiomas: An Analysis of 146 Cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2009 Jun. 3(2):116-130. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Lang DA, Evans BT, Ellison DW. Sphenoid wing meningioma en plaque: a clinical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001 Aug. 143(8):749-57; discussion 758. [Medline].

Barber AJ, Lawson DD, Field EA. Two case reports of orofacial paraesthesia demonstrating the role of the general dental practitioner in identifying patients with intracranial tumours. Prim Dent Care. 2009 Apr. 16(2):55-8. [Medline].

Panchmatia JR, Arvin B, Thomas DG. Meningioma–an unusual cause of a forehead lump. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Sep. 150(9):925-6; discussion 926. [Medline].

Stafford SL, Perry A, Leavitt JA, Garrity JA, Suman VJ, Scheithauer BW, et al. Anterior visual pathway meningiomas primarily resected between 1978 and 1988: the Mayo Clinic Rochester experience. J Neuroophthalmol. 1998 Sep. 18(3):206-10. [Medline].

Thompson LD, Gyure KA. Extracranial sinonasal tract meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases with a review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 May. 24(5):640-50. [Medline].

Thompson LD, Bouffard JP, Sandberg GD, Mena H. Primary ear and temporal bone meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 36 cases with a review of the literature. Mod Pathol. 2003 Mar. 16(3):236-45. [Medline].

Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, Suman VJ, Lohse CM. Meningioma grading: an analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 Dec. 21(12):1455-65. [Medline].

Perry A, Scheithauer BW, Stafford SL, Lohse CM, Wollan PC. “Malignancy” in meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients, with grading implications. Cancer. 1999 May 1. 85(9):2046-56. [Medline].

Gaffey MJ, Mills SE, Askin FB. Minute pulmonary meningothelial-like nodules. A clinicopathologic study of so-called minute pulmonary chemodectoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988 Mar. 12(3):167-75. [Medline].

Pelosi G, Maffini F, Decarli N, Viale G. Progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in minute meningothelioid nodules of the lung. Virchows Arch. 2002 May. 440(5):543-6. [Medline].

Sanei MH, Berjis N, Mahzouni P, Naimi A. A case of neck ectopic meningioma. Neuropathology. 2008 Apr. 28(2):157-9. [Medline].

Klaeboe L, Lonn S, Scheie D, Auvinen A, Christensen HC, Feychting M, et al. Incidence of intracranial meningiomas in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, 1968-1997. Int J Cancer. 2005 Dec 20. 117(6):996-1001. [Medline].

Baxter DS, Smith P, Stewart K, Murphy M. Clear cell meningioma presenting as rapidly deteriorating visual field and acuity during pregnancy. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Nov. 16(11):1502-4. [Medline].

Saitoh Y, Oku Y, Izumoto S, Go J. Rapid growth of a meningioma during pregnancy: relationship with estrogen and progesterone receptors–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1989 May. 29(5):440-3. [Medline].

Korhonen K, Salminen T, Raitanen J, Auvinen A, Isola J, Haapasalo H. Female predominance in meningiomas can not be explained by differences in progesterone, estrogen, or androgen receptor expression. J Neurooncol. 2006 Oct. 80(1):1-7. [Medline].

Louis DN, Ramesh V, Gusella JF. Neuropathology and molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis 2 and related tumors. Brain Pathol. 1995 Apr. 5(2):163-72. [Medline].

Nunes F, Shen Y, Niida Y, Beauchamp R, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Ramesh V, et al. Inactivation patterns of NF2 and DAL-1/4.1B (EPB41L3) in sporadic meningioma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005 Oct 15. 162(2):135-9. [Medline].

Gerber MA, Bahr SM, Gutmann DH. Protein 4.1B/differentially expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung-1 functions as a growth suppressor in meningioma cells by activating Rac1-dependent c-Jun-NH(2)-kinase signaling. Cancer Res. 2006 May 15. 66(10):5295-303. [Medline].

Shen Y, Nunes F, Stemmer-Rachamimov A, James M, Mohapatra G, Plotkin S, et al. Genomic profiling distinguishes familial multiple and sporadic multiple meningiomas. BMC Med Genomics. 2009 Jul 9. 2:42. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Heinrich B, Hartmann C, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Louis DN, MacCollin M. Multiple meningiomas: Investigating the molecular basis of sporadic and familial forms. Int J Cancer. 2003 Feb 10. 103(4):483-8. [Medline].

Kim NR, Choe G, Shin SH, Wang KC, Cho BK, Choi KS, et al. Childhood meningiomas associated with meningioangiomatosis: report of five cases and literature review. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2002 Feb. 28(1):48-56. [Medline].

Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Lillehei KO. Radiation-induced meningioma with a 63-year latency period. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1995 Mar. 82(3):487-8. [Medline].

Umansky F, Shoshan Y, Rosenthal G, Fraifeld S, Spektor S. Radiation-induced meningioma. Neurosurg Focus. 2008. 24(5):E7. [Medline].

Longstreth WT Jr, Phillips LE, Drangsholt M, Koepsell TD, Custer BS, Gehrels JA, et al. Dental X-rays and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a population-based case-control study. Cancer. 2004 Mar 1. 100(5):1026-34. [Medline].

Harrison MJ, Wolfe DE, Lau TS, Mitnick RJ, Sachdev VP. Radiation-induced meningiomas: experience at the Mount Sinai Hospital and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1991 Oct. 75(4):564-74. [Medline].

Mack EE, Wilson CB. Meningiomas induced by high-dose cranial irradiation. J Neurosurg. 1993 Jul. 79(1):28-31. [Medline].

Musa BS, Pople IK, Cummins BH. Intracranial meningiomas following irradiation–a growing problem?. Br J Neurosurg. 1995. 9(5):629-37. [Medline].

Kallio M, Sankila R, Hakulinen T, Jääskeläinen J. Factors affecting operative and excess long-term mortality in 935 patients with intracranial meningioma. Neurosurgery. 1992 Jul. 31(1):2-12. [Medline].

Hayhurst C, Mcmurtrie A, Brydon HL. Cutaneous meningioma of the scalp. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Dec. 146(12):1383-4; discussion 1384. [Medline].

Cesario A, Galetta D, Margaritora S, Granone P. Unsuspected primary pulmonary meningioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Mar. 21(3):553-5. [Medline].

Picquet J, Valo I, Jousset Y, Enon B. Primary pulmonary meningioma first suspected of being a lung metastasis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Apr. 79(4):1407-9. [Medline].

Wilson AJ, Ratliff JL, Lagios MD, Aguilar MJ. Mediastinal meningioma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1979 Dec. 3(6):557-62. [Medline].

Coons SW, Johnson PC. Brachial plexus meningioma, report of a case with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural examination. Acta Neuropathol. 1989. 77(4):445-8. [Medline].

Atlas SW, Lavi E, Goldberg HI. Extraaxial brain tumors. Atlas SW. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. 3. Lippincott Eilliams and Wilkins; 2002. 695-771.

Ho DM, Hsu CY, Ting LT, Chiang H. Histopathology and MIB-1 labeling index predicted recurrence of meningiomas: a proposal of diagnostic criteria for patients with atypical meningioma. Cancer. 2002 Mar 1. 94(5):1538-47. [Medline].

Korshunov A, Shishkina L, Golanov A. Immunohistochemical analysis of p16INK4a, p14ARF, p18INK4c, p21CIP1, p27KIP1 and p73 expression in 271 meningiomas correlation with tumor grade and clinical outcome. Int J Cancer. 2003 May 10. 104(6):728-34. [Medline].

Miller DC, Ojemann RG, Proppe KH, McGinnis BD, Grillo HC. Benign metastasizing meningioma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1985 May. 62(5):763-6. [Medline].

Ng TH, Wong MP, Chan KW. Benign metastasizing meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1990. 92(2):152-4. [Medline].

Bruno MC, Ginguené C, Santangelo M, Panagiotopoulos K, Piscopo GA, Tortora F, et al. Lymphoplasmacyte rich meningioma. A case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci. 2004 Sep. 48(3):117-24; discussion 124. [Medline].

Hasselblatt M, Nolte KW, Paulus W. Angiomatous meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of 38 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Mar. 28(3):390-3. [Medline].

Pimentel J, Fernandes A, Pinto AE, Fonseca I, Moura Nunes JF, Lobo Antunes J. Clear cell meningioma variant and clinical aggressiveness. Clin Neuropathol. 1998 May-Jun. 17(3):141-6. [Medline].

Lee DK, Kim DG, Choe G, Chi JG, Jung HW. Chordoid meningioma with polyclonal gammopathy. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2001 Jan. 94(1):122-6. [Medline].

Couce ME, Aker FV, Scheithauer BW. Chordoid meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of 42 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Jul. 24(7):899-905. [Medline].

Oakley GJ, Fuhrer K, Seethala RR. Brachyury, SOX-9, and podoplanin, new markers in the skull base chordoma vs chondrosarcoma differential: a tissue microarray-based comparative analysis. Mod Pathol. 2008 Dec. 21(12):1461-9. [Medline].

Sangoi AR, Dulai MS, Beck AH, Brat DJ, Vogel H. Distinguishing chordoid meningiomas from their histologic mimics: an immunohistochemical evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 May. 33(5):669-81. [Medline].

Ludwin SK, Rubinstein LJ, Russell DS. Papillary meningioma: a malignant variant of meningioma. Cancer. 1975 Oct. 36(4):1363-73. [Medline].

Kros JM, Cella F, Bakker SL, Paz Y Geuze D, Egeler RM. Papillary meningioma with pleural metastasis: case report and literature review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000 Sep. 102(3):200-2. [Medline].

Pasquier B, Gasnier F, Pasquier D, Keddari E, Morens A, Couderc P. Papillary meningioma. Clinicopathologic study of seven cases and review of the literature. Cancer. 1986 Jul 15. 58(2):299-305. [Medline].

Judkins AR, Mauger J, Ht A, Rorke LB, Biegel JA. Immunohistochemical analysis of hSNF5/INI1 in pediatric CNS neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 May. 28(5):644-50. [Medline].

Roser F, Samii M, Ostertag H, Bellinzona M. The Ki-67 proliferation antigen in meningiomas. Experience in 600 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Jan. 146(1):37-44; discussion 44. [Medline].

Nakasu S, Li DH, Okabe H, Nakajima M, Matsuda M. Significance of MIB-1 staining indices in meningiomas: comparison of two counting methods. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Apr. 25(4):472-8. [Medline].

Maier H, Wanschitz J, Sedivy R, Rössler K, Ofner D, Budka H. Proliferation and DNA fragmentation in meningioma subtypes. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1997 Dec. 23(6):496-506. [Medline].

Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, Suman VJ, Lohse CM. The prognostic significance of MIB-1, p53, and DNA flow cytometry in completely resected primary meningiomas. Cancer. 1998 Jun 1. 82(11):2262-9. [Medline].

Fukushima S, Terasaki M, Sakata K, Miyagi N, Kato S, Sugita Y, et al. Sensitivity and usefulness of anti-phosphohistone-H3 antibody immunostaining for counting mitotic figures in meningioma cases. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2009. 26(2):51-7. [Medline].

Ribalta T, McCutcheon IE, Aldape KD, Bruner JM, Fuller GN. The mitosis-specific antibody anti-phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3) facilitates rapid reliable grading of meningiomas according to WHO 2000 criteria. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Nov. 28(11):1532-6. [Medline].

Kim YJ, Ketter R, Steudel WI, Feiden W. Prognostic significance of the mitotic index using the mitosis marker anti-phosphohistone H3 in meningiomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007 Jul. 128(1):118-25. [Medline].

Meis JM, Ordóñez NG, Bruner JM. Meningiomas. An immunohistochemical study of 50 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Oct. 110(10):934-7. [Medline].

Schnitt SJ, Vogel H. Meningiomas. Diagnostic value of immunoperoxidase staining for epithelial membrane antigen. Am J Surg Pathol. 1986 Sep. 10(9):640-9. [Medline].

Artlich A, Schmidt D. Immunohistochemical profile of meningiomas and their histological subtypes. Hum Pathol. 1990 Aug. 21(8):843-9. [Medline].

Yamashima T, Sakuda K, Tohma Y, Yamashita J, Oda H, Irikura D, et al. Prostaglandin D synthase (beta-trace) in human arachnoid and meningioma cells: roles as a cell marker or in cerebrospinal fluid absorption, tumorigenesis, and calcification process. J Neurosci. 1997 Apr 1. 17(7):2376-82. [Medline].

Schwechheimer K, Zhou L, Birchmeier W. E-Cadherin in human brain tumours: loss of immunoreactivity in malignant meningiomas. Virchows Arch. 1998 Feb. 432(2):163-7. [Medline].

Hahn HP, Bundock EA, Hornick JL. Immunohistochemical staining for claudin-1 can help distinguish meningiomas from histologic mimics. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Feb. 125(2):203-8. [Medline].

Akat K, Mennel HD, Kremer P, Gassler N, Bleck CK, Kartenbeck J. Molecular characterization of desmosomes in meningiomas and arachnoidal tissue. Acta Neuropathol. 2003 Oct. 106(4):337-47. [Medline].

Arishima H, Sato K, Kubota T. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of gap junction proteins connexin26 and 43 in human arachnoid villi and meningeal tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002 Dec. 61(12):1048-55. [Medline].

Leães CG, Meurer RT, Coutinho LB, Ferreira NP, Pereira-Lima JF, da Costa Oliveira M. Immunohistochemical expression of aromatase and estrogen, androgen and progesterone receptors in normal and neoplastic human meningeal cells. Neuropathology. 23 Aug 2009.

Konstantinidou AE, Korkolopoulou P, Mahera H, Kotsiakis X, Hranioti S, Eftychiadis C, et al. Hormone receptors in non-malignant meningiomas correlate with apoptosis, cell proliferation and recurrence-free survival. Histopathology. 2003 Sep. 43(3):280-90. [Medline].

Kepes JJ. Meningiomas. Biology, pathology, and differential diagnosis. New York: Masson Publishing; 1982.

Zang KD. Meningioma: a cytogenetic model of a complex benign human tumor, including data on 394 karyotyped cases. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001. 93(3-4):207-20. [Medline].

Knudson AG Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr. 68(4):820-3. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Jacoby LB, Pulaski K, Rouleau GA, Martuza RL. Clonal analysis of human meningiomas and schwannomas. Cancer Res. 1990 Nov 1. 50(21):6783-6. [Medline].

von Deimling A, Larson J, Wellenreuther R, Stangl AP, van Velthoven V, Warnick R, et al. Clonal origin of recurrent meningiomas. Brain Pathol. 1999 Oct. 9(4):645-50. [Medline].

Stangl AP, Wellenreuther R, Lenartz D, Kraus JA, Menon AG, Schramm J, et al. Clonality of multiple meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 1997 May. 86(5):853-8. [Medline].

Larson JJ, Tew JM Jr, Simon M, Menon AG. Evidence for clonal spread in the development of multiple meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 1995 Oct. 83(4):705-9. [Medline].

Borovich B, Doron Y. Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: the role played by regional multicentricity. J Neurosurg. 1986 Jan. 64(1):58-63. [Medline].

Kim NR, Choe G, Shin SH, Wang KC, Cho BK, Choi KS, et al. Childhood meningiomas associated with meningioangiomatosis: report of five cases and literature review. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2002 Feb. 28(1):48-56. [Medline].

Kim WY, Kim IO, Kim S, Cheon JE, Yeon M. Meningioangiomatosis: MR imaging and pathological correlation in two cases. Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Feb. 32(2):96-8. [Medline].

Perry A, Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Scheithauer BW, et al. Insights into meningioangiomatosis with and without meningioma: a clinicopathologic and genetic series of 24 cases with review of the literature. Brain Pathol. 2005 Jan. 15(1):55-65. [Medline].

Rubinstein LJ. The malformative central nervous system lesions in the central and peripheral forms of neurofibromatosis. A neuropathological study of 22 cases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986. 486:14-29. [Medline].

Kar-Ming Fung, MD, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine

Kar-Ming Fung, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Neuropathologists, College of American Pathologists, United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Adekunle M Adesina, MD, PhD Professor, Medical Director, Section of Neuropathology, Director, Molecular Neuropathology Laboratory, Texas Children’s Hospital, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine

Adekunle M Adesina, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Neuropathologists, College of American Pathologists, United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Meningiomas Pathology 

Research & References of Meningiomas Pathology |A&C Accounting And Tax Services