Soft Tissue Implants

No Results

No Results

processing….

Soft tissue volume replacement with injectable materials has been a challenging problem for facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons. The quest for a safe, long-lasting, and predictable material still continues today.

Early investigators used materials based on availability and ease of application. Paraffin wax, petrolatum, vegetable oils, lanolin, silicone oil, and beeswax have been used for facial augmentation, but long-term follow-up revealed problems (eg, foreign body granulomas).

Although autogenous fat transplants have been used for decades, the field of minimally invasive soft tissue augmentation expanded with the introduction of injectable bovine collagen in 1981.

Zyderm and Zyplast (Collagen Corp, Palo Alto, CA) have been used with excellent safety records and are currently the criterion standard against which all new materials are judged. The major drawback of these materials is rapid absorption, with essentially no histological evidence of Zyplast by 6 months and Zyderm by 3 months.

The ideal material for soft tissue replacement/augmentation has not yet been identified, whether injectable or surgically implanted; permanent or temporary; biological or synthetic; allograft, homograft, or xenograft. Therefore, materials must be judged on relative merits and disadvantages. This article reviews injectable soft tissue fillers.

The images below depict soft tissue implants.

Soft tissue implants are used for the following purposes:

To reconstruct surgically or traumatically created tissue voids

To restore bulk to aging tissues in order to correct soft tissue folds or rhytides

To augment tissue for cosmetic enhancement

Traditionally, skin is divided into 3 layers, epidermis, basement membrane, and dermis. The epidermis is mainly composed of cells, while the dermis contains extracellular matrix, nerves, vasculature, and adnexal structures.

Injectable soft tissue fillers are generally injected into the dermal layer. The dermal layer allows for host incorporation of the material because of the presence of fibroblasts in the extracellular matrix and vasculature. Some materials are preferably placed in the subcutaneous layer because of implant nodularity and palpability.

Silicone

Silicone injection into facial tissues was popularized in the 1960s and 1970s with the introduction of medical grade silicone (MDX 4-4011) by Dow Corning. Microdroplets of silicone are dispersed within the dermal tissues. Fibrosis around these droplets localizes the material, and it is seemingly well tolerated in small amounts in the face.

Silicone oil has many advocates among those who used it prior to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrawal of approval. However, silicone, although chemically well tolerated, becomes encapsulated as a foreign body by a chronic inflammatory reaction. Giant cells surround the material and cannot process any ingested material, establishing a low-grade inflammatory nidus. Fibrous tissue surrounds and encapsulates the silicone; this capsule is avascular and is a potential site of infection. A number of late infections, granulomas, and palpable masses have been reported following silicone use. Currently, silicone oil is approved by the FDA for ophthalmic use only but is being used off label for facial soft tissue augmentation.

Bioplastique

Bioplastique (Uroplasty BV, Netherlands) is a biphasic material. It consists of solid silicone particles (ranging in size from 100-400 µm) suspended in a polyvinylpyrrolidone (CHNO) carrier.

Once injected, the material elicits a low-grade inflammatory reaction. The carrier is removed by the body and excreted by the kidneys. Collagen encapsulates and localizes the silicone, and animal studies have shown no evidence of foreign body migration. Deposition of collagen progresses, replacing the organic component of the material in a ratio slightly higher than 1:1. Therefore, overcorrection is not advised.

Case series have reported no major complications with Bioplastique other than overcorrection. Subcutaneous placement is recommended to avoid palpable nodularity. Bioplastique is not yet approved by the FDA.

Arteplast

Arteplast was introduced in Europe in 1991. Arteplast is an injectable material composed of microspheres of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) suspended in a gelatin solution. Gelatin is resorbed and replaced by native collagen. A rat model has shown that collagen deposition is detected at 3 weeks, and the density of collagen increases thereafter.

The decrease in space between microspheres is believed to be the result of collagen deposition and consolidation, leading to loss of volume correction. PMMA beads average 20-40 µm in size and are theoretically subject to phagocytosis.

Artecoll/Bellafill

Artecoll was introduced in 1995 and was intended to replace Arteplast. Artecoll consists of smooth PMMA spheres (30-40 µm in size) suspended in bovine collagen (ie, 25% PMMA, 75% collagen, by weight).

Human studies indicated a need for subdermal placement and slight overcorrection. Follow-up over 1-2 years showed that 90% of patients were satisfied with treatment.

An improved form of PMMA, ArteFill, which was of greater purity, was approved in 2006 by the FDA for correction of moderate nasolabial folds (with use in the lips specifically contraindicated). In 2014, the ’s name was changed to Bellafill, and in 2015, it was approved by the FDA for the treatment of acne scars. [1, 2]

Radiesse

Radiesse (Bioform, Inc, San Mateo, Calif) is a suspension of calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) particles in glycerin and saline. Once injected just below the dermis, the glycerin carrier is absorbed, and a mild fibrous response is deposited around the CaHA particles, stabilizing the implants and adding further bulk. The clinical effect of Radiesse is estimated to be between 12 and 18 months. Caution is advised when treating the lips, as a high risk of subcutaneous nodules has been noted when treating this area. Radiesse is currently approved by the FDA for correction of nasolabial folds.

Sculptra

Sculptra (poly-L-lactic acid, Dermik Laboratories, Berwyn, Pa) is a preparation of poly-L-lactic acid particles that are injected into the superficial subdermis, where a fibrous response is elicited. Sculptra is injected in 4-6 sessions while a volume response is created. Persistence is reported to last up to 2 years. Sculptra is currently FDA approved for the treatment of HIV protease inhibitor–induced lipodystrophy.

Injectable bovine collagen

The FDA approved injectable bovine collagen (ie, Zyderm) in 1981. Zyderm is a suspension of collagen fibrils from chemically processed bovine skin. Zyplast contains the same material, but collagen fibers are cross-linked with glutaraldehyde.

Human and bovine collagens differ in terminal telopeptide units. These telopeptides must be enzymatically removed during the Zyderm manufacturing process to reduce immunogenicity.

Zyderm and Zyplast require skin testing because of a 3% reactivity risk. Studies show an average of 4-6 months of histologic persistence for Zyderm; most users of bovine collagen describe 3-4 months of clinical effect from Zyplast injection, while Zyderm results are shorter lived. Cosmoderm and Cosmoplast were introduced to limit allergenic potential and are analogs of Zyderm and Zyplast, respectively. Collagen fibers for these are produced by human fibroblasts in vitro, rather than derived from bovine skin. Longevity of clinical effect is similar.

A patient can be seen prior to bovine collagen injection for lip augmentation in the first image below and immediately following injection in the second image below.

Injectable porcine collagen

Porcine collagen cross-linked in a 3-dimensional structure is currently FDA approved and available as Evolence. This material is best injected into the deep dermis or at the dermal-subdermal border, and its clinical effects appear to last about 12 months. Although clinical results were generally quite good, [3] the manufacturer has withdrawn this material from sale.

Hyaluronan derivatives

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a polysaccharide that plays an integral role in stabilizing the extracellular matrix. It does not elicit any humoral or cell-mediated immune response and therefore does not require pretreatment skin tests.

Restylane (Medicis Aesthetics, Scottsdale, Ariz) is a gel formed by cross-linking bacteria fermented HA via bridges and particulated into beads at 200 µm in size. The same manufacturer also supplies Perlane, which is chemically identical to Restylane but has a larger particle size. Perlane is injected subdermally and lasts approximately 9-12 months, while Restylane is injected into the mid-dermis and persists for 5-7 months.

Hylaform (Inamed Aesthetics, Santa Barbara, Calif) is an insoluble derivative formed by treating animal-derived HA with vinyl sulfone, while Captique is bacteria-derived HA cross-linked in a similar way.

Juvéderm is a spectrum of materials composed of nonanimal source HA cross-linked in a way similar to Restylane, but to a much greater degree. It has been approved for facial soft tissue augmentation by the FDA, and seems to behave similarly to Restylane and Perlane.

In clinical trials, Restylane and Juvéderm have been shown to persist clinically in nasolabial folds as long as 6 months, while Hylaform and Hylaform Plus persist only about 3 months (Hylaform and Hylaform Plus are no longer sold in the United States). FDA-approved modifications of Restylane (Perlane) and Juvéderm Ultra (Juvéderm Ultra Plus) are thicker materials with larger HA particles designed to be injected subdermally. [4] These fillers work particularly well for treatment of nasolabial folds and last 12 months or more. [5, 6]

Belotero is a recent addition to the US market and is also an HA derivative. Belotero appears to yield a smoother correction, especially soon after treatment, but is otherwise very similar to Restylane and Juvéderm. [7]

Other HA materials include Elevess and Prevelle. Published studies with these materials are lacking, although they are attractive fillers because they contain lidocaine, which aids in providing maximal patient comfort.

Fibrel

Fibrel (Mentor Corp, Goleta, Ga) is a mixture of plasma, porcine-derived gelatin, and e-aminocaproic acid. The mixture is injected intradermally. The resultant tissue reaction leads to fibrinogen deposition, followed by fibrinolysis and collagen formation.

Fibrel is FDA-approved for treatment of depressed scars and rhytides. Studies describe increasing collagen content of the wound site over the first 6 months, followed by partial reduction of collagen by 9 months. Overcorrection is recommended. Fibrel is currently not available commercially.

Dermalogen

Homologous collagen dispersion (Dermalogen, Collagenesis Inc, Beverly, Mass) is a suspension of processed dermis obtained from the tissue banks accredited by the Association of Tissue Banks (AATB).

A mechanical process homogenizes the decellularized material to produce a suspension of type I collagen, traces of types III and VI collagen, elastin, fibronectin, chondroitin sulfate, and other proteoglycans.

Dermalogen is well tolerated and elicits a low-grade inflammatory response. It is injected into the superficial to mid-dermal level. Dermalogen appears to persist between 3-6 months. Dermologen is currently not clinically available.

Cymetra

Acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm Acellular Tissue, LifeCell Corp, Branchburg, NJ) is prepared from donated human skin that is processed into an acellular matrix of dermal proteins and proteoglycans.

The FDA classifies it as banked human tissue when used for damaged or insufficient soft tissue replacement. To some degree, the persistence of sheet AlloDerm placed through an incision appears to be permanent (ie, 20-50% at >1 year).

An injectable form, Cymetra allows injection through a 26-gauge needle and promotes deep dermal fibrosis. A series of injections is necessary in order to build adequate augmentation.

Autologous fat injections may offer dual benefits, as most patients desire reduction of some area of excess adipose tissue. Tissue harvested via liposuction can be used for volume augmentation. This has been well described by Coleman. However, this technique appears to be highly operator-dependent. Most workers have been unable to duplicate Coleman’s results and instead describe only a 10-20% residual effect after the first 12 months.

Isolagen (Isolagen Technologies Inc, Paramus, NJ) refers to cultured autologous fibroblasts. Following a skin biopsy, autologous fibroblasts are expanded in vitro. A suspension of these fibroblasts is injected into the dermis, where, theoretically, they produce collagen.

West and Alster treated 11 patients with Isolagen, noting persistent correction in nasolabial folds as long as 6 months following injection. [8] Longer follow-up is necessary. Isolagen is currently sold as LaViv (Fibrocell Science, Inc.)

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) is by far the most commonly used synthetic implantable material for soft tissue augmentation. [9] Currently, it is marketed as Gore-Tex subcutaneous augmentation material (SAM) or Advanta implants. These materials have been used extensively for nasolabial fold correction, lip augmentation, and prevention of Frey syndrome following parotidectomy. E-PTFE is very well tolerated and glides easily through tissue, making the necessary surgical cavity only slightly larger than the implant itself. The material is microporous and displays minimal tissue ingrowth. To promote tissue stabilization of the implant, Advanta implants have a dual porosity, with a softer, larger pore center and a smaller pore periphery that allows limited soft tissue ingrowth.

Homologous

Acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm, LifeCell Corp, Branchburg, NJ) is derived from skin obtained from tissue banks. The skin is de-epithelialized, and the dermis is then decellularized, leaving a matrix of dermal protein. AlloDerm can be used for correction of nasolabial folds, for correction of atrophic lips, and for reconstruction of large-volume deficits following tumor extirpation. Long-term data is still pending, but AlloDerm does seem to persist indefinitely to some variable degree.

Autologous

Many autologous materials have been suggested (eg, fascia lata, dermal-fat grafts). Fascia is generally too thin to provide significant bulk. Dermal-fat grafts can be used successfully, especially if skin excision is already planned; careful and thorough removal of all epidermis is necessary to epidermal inclusion cyst development.

Although infection is always a possibility with use of any of the materials described above, some materials have unique complications. Silicone can cause foreign body reactions and rejection of the implant for up to 20 years following implantation. Synthetic implants of any kind can produce nodularity if placed in an improper plane. Zyderm and Zyplast cause allergic responses in up to 3% of those injected. Sculptra has been associated with subcutaneous nodules in over 50% of patients in one study, although this is now believed to be a technical issue related to inadequate hydration and mixing of the filler after reconstitution.

The search for a natural, safe, easy to administer, and permanent soft tissue filler continues. Great strides have been made in the last 25 years. As the understanding of tissue physiology continues to improve, the ideal soft tissue implant may eventually be produced.

FDA Approves First Dermal Filler to Treat Acne Scarring. Medscape. Jan 6 2015. [Full Text].

Gold MH, Sadick NS. Optimizing outcomes with polymethylmethacrylate fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Mar 30. [Medline].

Narins RS, Brandt FS, Lorenc ZP, Maas CS, Monheit GD, Smith SR. Twelve-month persistency of a novel ribose-cross-linked collagen dermal filler. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jun. 34 Suppl 1:S31-9. [Medline].

Li D, Xie Y, Li Q, et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Juvéderm Ultra Plus Injectable Gel in Correcting Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan. 5 (1):e1133. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Pinsky MA, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, Walker PS. Juvéderm injectable gel: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectiveness. Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Jan-Feb. 28(1):17-23. [Medline].

Wu Y, Xu J, Jia Y, Murphy DK. Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Gel in Correcting Moderate Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Subjects. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Jan. 15 (1):70-6. [Medline].

Prager W, Wissmueller E, Havermann I, Bee EK, Howell DJ, Zschocke I, et al. A prospective, split-face, randomized, comparative study of safety and 12-month longevity of three formulations of hyaluronic acid dermal filler for treatment of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul. 38(7 Pt 2):1143-50. [Medline].

West TB, Alster TS. Autologous human collagen and dermal fibroblasts for soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg. 1998 May. 24(5):510-2. [Medline].

Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang S, Lei Z, Li X, Fan D. The use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in depressed deformities of the face. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Nov. 12 (5):3151-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Baumann LS, Shamban AT, Lupo MP, et al. Comparison of smooth-gel hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with cross-linked bovine collagen: a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, within-subject study. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Dec. 33 Suppl 2:S128-35. [Medline].

Dewan PA, Byard RW. Histological response to injected Polytef and Bioplastique in a rat model. Br J Urol. 1994 Apr. 73(4):370-6. [Medline].

Ersek RA, Beisang AA 3rd. Bioplastique: a new biphasic polymer for minimally invasive injection implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992 . 16(1):59-65. [Medline].

Ersek RA, Gregory SR, Salisbury AV. Bioplastique at 6 years: clinical outcome studies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Nov. 100(6):1570-4. [Medline].

Gold MH. Fibrel. Dermatol Clin. 1995 Apr. 13(2):353-61. [Medline].

Jost G. Experience with collagen injection for the correction of contour deficiencies. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1985. 9(2):163-5. [Medline].

Klein AW, Wexler P, Carruthers A, Carruthers J. Treatment of facial furrows and rhytides. Dermatol Clin. 1997 Oct. 15(4):595-607. [Medline].

Lemperle G, Gauthier-Hazan N, Lemperle M. PMMA-Microspheres (Artecoll) for long-lasting correction of wrinkles: refinements and statistical results. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct. 22(5):356-65. [Medline].

Lemperle G, Ott H, Charrier U, et al. PMMA microspheres for intradermal implantation: Part I. Animal research. Ann Plast Surg. 1991 Jan. 26(1):57-63. [Medline].

Mladick RA. Twelve months of experience with Bioplastique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992 . 16(1):69-76. [Medline].

Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, Rubin M, Smith S. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun. 29(6):588-95. [Medline].

Narins RS, Brandt FS, Lorenc ZP, Maas CS, Monheit GD, Smith SR. Twelve-month persistency of a novel ribose-cross-linked collagen dermal filler. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jun. 34 Suppl 1:S31-9. [Medline].

Piacquadio D, Jarcho M, Goltz R. Evaluation of hylan b gel as a soft-tissue augmentation implant material. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Apr. 36(4):544-9. [Medline].

Pieyre JM. Collagen injections: two years’ experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1985. 9(2):153-4. [Medline].

Salles AG, Lotierzo PH, Gimenez R, Camargo CP, Ferreira MC. Evaluation of the poly-L-lactic acid implant for treatment of the nasolabial fold: 3-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Sep. 32(5):753-6. [Medline].

Simons G, Mazaleyrat P, Masurel T. Utilization of injectable microimplants in aesthetic facial surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992 Winter. 16(1):77-82. [Medline].

Tzikas TL. A 52-month summary of results using calcium hydroxylapatite for facial soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jun. 34 Suppl 1:S9-15. [Medline].

Williams SK, Patula VB, Kleinert LB, Martakos P, Lane JP, Karwoski T. Dual porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jun. 115(7):1995-2006. [Medline].

Anthony P Sclafani, MD Professor of Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medical College; Director of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine

Anthony P Sclafani, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Andrew Jacono, MD Chief, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The North Shore University Hospital at Manhasset; Assistant Professor, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York Medical College; Assistant Professor, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Director, The New York Center for Facial Plastic and Laser Surgery

Andrew Jacono, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Keith A LaFerriere, MD Clinical Professor, Fellowship Director, Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Keith A LaFerriere, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cerescan;RxRevu;Cliexa;Preacute Population Health Management;The Physicians Edge<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: The Physicians Edge, Cliexa<br/> Received stock from RxRevu; Received ownership interest from Cerescan for ; for: Rxblockchain;Bridge Health.

Gregory Branham, MD Vice-Chair, Director, Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine

Gregory Branham, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Physician Executives, and Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Soft Tissue Implants

Research & References of Soft Tissue Implants|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source

130 thoughts on “Soft Tissue Implants”


Leave a Reply