Dementia Pathology 

No Results

No Results

processing….

Multiple neuropathologic processes may underlie dementia, including both neurodegenerative diseases and vascular disease. Dementia is most common in elderly individuals, with advancing age being the strongest risk factor. Furthermore, comorbidity (the presence of more than one disease process) is the rule rather than the exception for dementia in elderly persons. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease responsible for dementia. About half of dementia cases result from AD; [1, 2] however, a variable but measurable amount of AD pathologic changes exist in most cognitively intact elderly individuals who undergo autopsy, indicating that AD is a chronic disease with latent and prodromal stages and suggesting that individuals may have varying abilities to compensate, either biologically or functionally, for the presence of AD. [5]

As with many neurodegenerative diseases, both rare autosomal-dominant forms of AD and more common sporadic forms with genetic risk factors without causative mutations exist. Abnormalities in 3 genes are known to cause AD with high penetrance: APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. Autosomal-dominant forms of AD tend to be more severe and occur at a younger age than sporadic AD but are relatively rare. Sporadic AD accounts for the vast majority of AD cases. The neuropathologic changes of autosomal-dominant and sporadic AD are largely the same.

AD is characterized grossly by progressive atrophy and gliosis, first of the hippocampus and mesial temporal lobe, followed by other association cortices (frontal and parietal lobes), and finally by primary motor or sensory cortex (occipital lobe).

AD is characterized diagnostically by 2 histologic findings: (1) extracellular amorphus eosinophilic deposits of amyloid consisting of Aβ peptides (a cleavage product of APP), which are referred to as amyloid plaques and (2) intraneuronal aggregates of abnormally modified microtubule-associated protein tau (neurofibrillary tangles; see the image below).

Both amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are readily identified using silver staining techniques such as Bielschowsky or Gallyas. Amyloid plaques are sometimes referred to as “senile plaques” in older literature because of their long association with dementia. Amyloid plaques with evidence of damaged neuronal processes are called neuritic plaques. [6]

Accumulating evidence suggests that Aβ is involved in the etiology of AD, although the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Amyloid angiopathy is another pathologic finding in the AD spectrum, in which Aβ accumulates in the media of small arteries. Amyloid angiopathy can be identified using stains for amyloidal protein (Congo red, thioflavin-S), or immunohistochemical staining against Aβ (see the image below). Although amyloid angiopathy has been associated with lobar hemorrhages, it is not a strong predictor of cognitive status.

Current pathologic criteria for the diagnosis of AD require the presence of neuritic plaques; [6] however, neuritic plaque burden does not correlate well with cognitive status during life. Instead, neurofibrillary tangle distribution is more strongly associated with cognitive status.

The staging criteria for neurofibrillary tangle distribution has 6 levels (I-VI) referred to as the Braak stage, with each successive stage demonstrating tangles in additional brain regions. [7] Neurofibrillary tangles are present in transentorhinal cortex in stage I, in the CA1 sector of the hippocampus in stage II, in the subiculum in stage III, in other areas of the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex in stage IV, in the association cortex in stage V, and in primary motor or sensory cortex or the granule neurons of dentate fascia in stage VI. [7, 8, 9]

Vascular brain injury (VBI) is widely recognized as a common cause of cognitive impairment (vascular cognitive impairment) culminating in vascular dementia. Most vascular dementia cases are sporadic and share risk factors with peripheral vascular disease. A widely used method for the clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia in life is the Hachinski Ischemic Score, which is assessed by determining whether the individual has experienced an abrupt onset or stepwise progressive course of specific signs and symptoms and the presence of vascular risk factors. [10] Pathologic assessment of VBI has been hindered by the lack of a clear, standardized, and widely accepted rubric for diagnosis and staging. Gross ischemic infarcts, lacunar infarcts, arteriolosclerosis, and microscopically identified infarcts (see image below) have all been independently associated with vascular dementia.

With the widespread adoption of MRI (beyond its ability to enhance the diagnosis of ischemic infarcts), more subtle ischemic injury can appreciably be visualized as T2 signal hyperintensities in white matter in living individuals. Although these changes are often classified under the rubric of “small-vessel disease,” their precise pathologic correlates are not well understood but may include ischemia-induced demyelination and/or axonal loss, arteriolosclerosis, microscopic infarcts, breakdown of the blood brain barrier, and/or breakdown of the blood CSF barrier.

Wharton et al conducted a literature review of studies that utilized samples from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study neuropathology cohort to identify cerebral white matter lesions. Expression of hypoxia-related molecules and other injury and protective cellular pathways reported in immunohistochemical and gene expression microarray studies suggest that hypoxia and ischemia play a role in the pathology of white matter lesions. Other pathogenic factors include immune activation, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, altered cell metabolic pathways, and glial cell injury. The investigators reported that these abnormalities are not confined to white matter lesions but are also found in apparently normal white matter in brains with lesions, suggesting a field effect of white matter abnormality within which lesions arise. They concluded that white matter lesions have a complex pathogenesis that may offer a number of primary and secondary intervention targets. [11]

Two criteria that have been suggested for the pathologic diagnosis of vascular dementia include (1) multiple large and/or strategic infarcts in cerebrum [12] or (2) a threshold of 3 or more microscopic infarcts identified in a systematic screening of cerebral cortex and deep cerebral structures. [1, 2, 13] VBI is commonly comorbid with AD in elderly patients with dementia, especially in a community setting.

A rare autosomal-dominant disease that causes multiple small strokes and may culminate in vascular dementia is cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). CADASIL is caused by mutations in NOTCH3.

Lewy body dementia (LBD) refers to pathologic changes that underlie several closely related syndromes. Most manifest with a movement disorder component, and the clinical diagnosis received in life often depends on the interval between the diagnosis of dementia and the onset of movement disorder symptoms. If a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease is followed by dementia a minimum of 1 year later, then a diagnosis of Parkinson disease dementia is assigned. If the onset of dementia precedes or is roughly concurrent with the onset of Parkinson disease, then the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (not to be confused with LBD) is used.

By the time the postmortem diagnosis of LBD can be confirmed, years would have passed since the initial clinical diagnosis, making Parkinson disease dementia and LBD difficult to distinguish. Most LBDs are sporadic and are frequently associated with increased age and the male sex. Organophosphate pesticide exposure is a known risk factor. Of interest, several lines of evidence suggest that a history of cigarette smoking may protect from the processes that lead to LBD.

Lewy bodies are spherical eosinophilic intraneuronal inclusion bodies surrounded by a clear halo (see image “A” below). Lewy body distribution and number are the diagnostic findings of LBD. In pigmented neurons, LBs are easy to identify with standard hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections.

Lewy bodies comprise a number of different aggregated proteins, the most diagnostically useful of which is alpha-synuclein. Loss of pigment-bearing neurons is seen in the pigmented nuclei of the brainstem accompanied by the presence of neuromelanin in scavenger macrophages (pigment “incontinence”). Pigment loss in Parkinson disease is most severe in the ventrolateral tier of the substantia nigra, which contrasts with normal aging, in which some pigment loss is seen in the dorsal tier. Immunohistochemical staining against alpha-synuclein aids in detection of Lewy bodies in nonpigmented neurons such as in cortex (see image “B” below).

Distribution of Lewy bodies in the CNS progresses in a rostral manner. Incidental Lewy bodies present only in the medulla are usually clinically silent or may be associated with premortem symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. A brain stem–predominant distribution of LB in the medulla and substantia nigra may be clinically silent or associated with a premortem clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Limbic distribution involves brainstem structures, as well as the amygdala, entorhinal cortex, and cingulate gyrus. The clinical correlate for this stage is unclear but may include cognitive impairment.

Diffuse distribution involves all of the brainstem and limbic structures, as well as the isocortex. In diffuse LBD, the cortex is variably atrophic, and, in more severe cases, vacuolization of the superficial cortical layers often exists. Most cases of LBD can be classified using hematoxylin and eosin sections of substantia nigra and immunohistochemical staining against alpha-synuclein in sections of medulla, amygdala, cingulate gyrus, and frontal cortex. [14, 15] Pathologic changes of LBD and AD may also coexist in patients with dementia.

AD, VBI, and LBD are all highly prevalent disease processes and often occur simultaneously. [1, 2, 3, 4] Further, clinically silent pathology is very common in the aging population. Over 50% of all individuals who undergo autopsy and 40% of individuals without dementia have intermediate or high AD pathology. Approximately 60% of these individuals have chronic VBI.

In the elderly population, comorbidity is the rule rather than the exception (see the image below). The likelihood that an individual had clinical dementia preceding death increases with the number of comorbid pathologies.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative disorders that are characterized clinically by early onset (usually sixth and seventh decade), loss of executive function, and relative sparing of memory function. Pathologically, they have variable atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes that is often asymmetric. FTDs are heterogenous with multiple etiologies and many have characteristic histopathologic changes. [16]

Pick disease is probably the most well-known of the FTDs and is characterized by widespread presence of spherical intraneuronal Pick bodies that are positive for microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), as well as other proteins (see the image below). Pick bodies may also be identified using silver staining techniques such as Bielschowsky or Gallyas.

One FTD characterized by the presence of ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTD-U) occurs as part of a disease spectrum with motor neuron disease. A familial form of FTD, FTD with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, was later found to map to the MAPT locus and has characteristic tau pathology. Multiple other FTDs exist; some have characteristic neuronal inclusions (eg, neurofilament, TAR DNA binding protein-43), while others lack distinctive histopathologic changes. Single gene defects have been identified for many FTDs, including PGRN, FUS, CHMP2B, and VCP. The prevalence of FTD is low, and the population prevalence of sporadic and genetic disease is not known.

Prion diseases are a family of neurodegenerative diseases that are unique in 2 ways. First, they are transmissible although not infectious. Second, the transmitting agent is a misfolded protein called the prion protein, capable of causing native, normally folded protein to adopt this disease-associated conformation when introduced into an organism. The transmissibility of prion diseases was first described in studying an endemic prion disease called kuru among the Fore tribe of Papua New Guinea. Kuru is characterized by rapid loss of motor and intellectual function, body tremors, and pathological laughter. Further study revealed that Fore funeral practice included cannibalism. Since this practice was outlawed among the Fore, the disease has disappeared.

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is the most common form of prion disease and occurs at a rate of approximately one case per one million population per year. Both sporadic and autosomal-dominant genetic forms of CJD exist. Pathologically, prion diseases are characterized by spongiform encephalopathy and deposition of highly protease-resistant prion protein aggregates (see the image below). Spongiform encephalopathy—the appearance of coalescent vacuoles within the grey matter neuropil—is accompanied by neuron loss and gliosis. The vacuoles are dilated neuronal processes. Diagnosis of prion diseases requires biochemical analyses of the glycosylated forms of the abnormal prion protein.

If a prion disease is suspected by a physician, contacting the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center is imperative.

Huntington disease (HD) is unique among the dementing illnesses in that it is always caused by a defect in a single gene, HTT. It is almost always autosomal dominant, and, essentially, no sporadic form exists, although rare de novo mutations exist. HD is caused by a trinucleotide (CAG) repeat expansion in HTT that causes an elongated polyglutamine repeat in the Huntington protein. Clinically, HD is primarily characterized by its characteristic choreiform movement disorder, but it also includes psychiatric disturbances and ultimately dementia.

Pathologically, HD is characterized primarily by neuronal loss, atrophy, and gliosis of the caudate and putamen beginning in the anterior medial caudate. As the disease progresses, this neuronal loss, atrophy and gliosis may involve multiple brain regions. Immunohistochemical staining against polyglutamine reveals intraneuronal inclusions, although this finding is usually not necessary for the diagnosis. Pathologic staging is performed by assessing the amount of atrophy, neuronal loss, and gliosis in the caudate and putamen. [17]

Tauopathies are a heterogenous group of neurodegenerative disorders that may culminate in dementia and are characterized by abnormal accumulations of tau protein often both in neurons and glia (see the image below). [18] This group includes corticobasal ganglionic degeneration, the Parkinson-dementia complex of Guam (also called Bodig-Lytigo), and argyrophilic grain disease. Several lines of evidence suggest that AD is also a tauopathy. The clinical presentation of these diseases varies and includes both cognitive impairment and movement disorders.

Sonnen JA, Larson EB, Crane PK, et al. Pathological correlates of dementia in a longitudinal, population-based sample of aging. Ann Neurol. 2007 Oct. 62(4):406-13. [Medline].

White L, Petrovitch H, Hardman J, et al. Cerebrovascular pathology and dementia in autopsied Honolulu-Asia Aging Study participants. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Nov. 977:9-23. [Medline].

Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, et al. Neuropathology of older persons without cognitive impairment from two community-based studies. Neurology. 2006 Jun 27. 66(12):1837-44. [Medline].

Knopman DS, Parisi JE, Salviati A, et al. Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003 Nov. 62(11):1087-95. [Medline].

Stern Y. Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006 Jul-Sep. 20(3 Suppl 2):S69-74. [Medline].

Group. TN-RW. Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1997. 18:S1-S2.

Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer’s disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol Aging. 1995 May-Jun. 16(3):271-8; discussion 278-84. [Medline].

Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1991 Apr. 41(4):479-86. [Medline].

Thies B, Truschke E, Morrison-Bogorad M, Hodes RJ. Consensus report of the Working Group on: molecular and biochemical markers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1999 Mar-Apr. 20(2):247. [Medline].

Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, et al. Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol. 1975 Sep. 32(9):632-7. [Medline].

Wharton SB, Simpson JE, Brayne C, Ince PG. Age-Associated White Matter Lesions: The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Brain Pathol. 2015 Jan. 25(1):35-43. [Medline].

Jellinger KA. The pathology of “vascular dementia”: a critical update. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008 May. 14(1):107-23. [Medline].

Brayne C, Richardson K, Matthews FE, et al. Neuropathological correlates of dementia in over-80-year-old brain donors from the population-based Cambridge city over-75s cohort (CC75C) study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009. 18(3):645-58. [Medline].

McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, et al. Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology. 1996 Nov. 47(5):1113-24. [Medline].

Dickson DW, Braak H, Duda JE, et al. Neuropathological assessment of Parkinson’s disease: refining the diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Dec. 8(12):1150-7. [Medline].

Cairns NJ, Bigio EH, Mackenzie IR, et al. Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Jul. 114(1):5-22. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Vonsattel JP, Myers RH, Stevens TJ, Ferrante RJ, Bird ED, Richardson EP Jr. Neuropathological classification of Huntington’s disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1985 Nov. 44(6):559-77. [Medline].

Lee VM, Goedert M, Trojanowski JQ. Neurodegenerative tauopathies. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001. 24:1121-59. [Medline].

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th. Washington, DC: 2000.

Thomas J Montine, MD, PhD Alvord Endowed Chair in Neuropathology, Professor of Pathology and Adjunct Professor of Neurological Surgery, Interim Chair, Department of Pathology, Associate Director, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Founding Director, Alvord Brain Tumor Center, University of Washington School of Medicine; Adjunct Professor in Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine; Director, Pacific Northwest Udall Center, University of Washington School of Medicine and Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar, MD Fellow, Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine

Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joshua A Sonnen, MD Assistant Professor, Neuropathology Fellowship Director, Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine

Joshua A Sonnen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Neuropathologists, College of American Pathologists, United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Adekunle M Adesina, MD, PhD Professor, Medical Director, Section of Neuropathology, Director, Molecular Neuropathology Laboratory, Texas Children’s Hospital, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine

Adekunle M Adesina, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Neuropathologists, College of American Pathologists, United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

The authors would like to thank Drs. Kathleen Montine and Arlene Sonnen for their editorial assistance.

Dementia Pathology 

Research & References of Dementia Pathology |A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source