Audit documentation: Tips for getting it right
For many staff auditors, the very mention of working paper review is enough to make their hair stand on end. No matter how thoroughly they perform an audit procedure, they know if their documentation does not reflect what they’ve done, they can expect review comments from their supervisor.
This is a vital lesson that is instilled in auditors from the beginning of their careers: Insufficient documentation represents a failure to comply with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). That lesson has never been more relevant than it is today.
Starting in 2014, the AICPA Peer Review Program has performed what are called “enhanced oversights.” Through these oversights, subject–matter experts from public practice review a sample of engagements after they have been subject to peer review. The AICPA then tracks the number of engagements that did not conform to applicable professional standards in all material respects (commonly referred to as “materially nonconforming” engagements).
The experts have found high levels of material nonconformity, and the most common cause has been noncompliance with AU–C Section 230, Audit Documentation. In fact, one out of every four engagements subject to these enhanced oversights by the Peer Review Program was materially nonconforming due to a lack of adequate audit documentation.
By collecting information from the firms subject to enhanced oversights, we’ve learned that three common misconceptions are driving nonconformity. They are:
Let’s examine these one at a time:
Misconception No. 1: Auditors can meet their overall audit objectives without documenting their work
Through enhanced oversights, numerous firms have expressed their belief that sufficient evidence to support the audit opinion can be obtained without meeting the requirements of AU–C Section 230.
For example, on one of the single–audit engagements subject to enhanced oversight, the engagement team had no documentation related to their tests of controls over compliance. When the subject–matter expert concluded that the engagement was materially nonconforming, the engagement partner disagreed. He explained to the expert that because the required tests had been performed, he reasoned, he had done enough to support the audit opinion.
This is not an appropriate reading of the requirements of GAAS.
Under AU–C Section 200, Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance With Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence is necessary to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level and thereby enable the auditor to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor’s opinion.
Meeting the requirements of AU–C Section 230, and the specific documentation requirements of other relevant AU–C sections, provides evidence of the auditor’s basis for his or her audit opinion as well as evidence that the audit was planned and performed in accordance with GAAS, according to paragraph .02 of AU–C Section 230.
If sufficient appropriate audit evidence necessary to support the audit opinion was not appropriately documented, then the audit was not conducted in accordance with GAAS and the auditor would not have a basis to render an opinion.
In such instances, the auditor should take appropriate action under AU–C Section 585, Consideration of Omitted Procedures After the Report Release Date. This includes assessing the effect of omitted procedures on the auditor’s ability to support the audit opinion and may include performing the omitted procedures or alternative procedures. Omitted procedures may include documenting procedures in accordance with AU–C Section 230 that had been performed but not previously documented along with the evidence obtained from those procedures.
Misconception No. 2: A signoff on an audit program is sufficient documentation of a detail test
The Peer Review team identified numerous instances in which the auditor believed a signoff on an audit program was sufficient documentation of a detail test. For example, on an audit of a defined contribution plan, one auditor believed he had met the requirements for documenting his testing of participant eligibility by signing off on the program step relative to that test even though there was no documentation of the evidence obtained.
Signing off on an audit program is rarely sufficient to meet the requirements of the Audit Documentation standard. In accordance with paragraph .08 of AU–C Section 230, the auditor should document:
These should be documented for any procedure that provides audit evidence that is necessary to support the audit opinion.
In some cases, a signoff on an audit program might address the nature of the procedure, who performed it, who reviewed it, and maybe the timing of the procedure. The other requirements of the standard, however, would ordinarily not be met.
Misconception No. 3: Oral explanation can substitute for written documentation to meet the requirements of AU-C Section 230
Another common finding in the enhanced oversights was the reliance of auditors and peer reviewers on oral explanation as a substitute for written documentation to meet the requirements of AU–C Section 230.
As AU–C Section 230, paragraph .A7 notes, if the auditor meets the requirements of AU–C Section 230 but clarification is needed, oral explanation may be used to provide that clarification.
For example, if the results of an auditor’s procedures and the auditor’s conclusion with respect to those procedures appear inconsistent to a third–party reviewer, the auditor may use oral explanation to supplement his or her documentation.
However, expert oversight uncovered numerous instances in which oral explanation was relied on inappropriately.
For example, when reviewing a single audit, one peer reviewer noted that a firm failed to document its consideration of direct and material compliance requirements. The reviewer discussed the matter with the firm, and he concluded that the engagement team had complied with applicable professional standards based on oral explanation. However, there was no documented evidence that the engagement team had performed this required procedure.
If an auditor performs a procedure that provides audit evidence that is necessary to support the audit opinion, and the auditor’s documentation of that evidence does not meet the requirements of AU–C Section 230, the auditor has not complied with GAAS, and no amount of oral explanation can serve as a substitute.
Auditors seeking to identify and address potential documentation deficiencies in their practice should review AU–C Section 230 and use the free resources available on the AICPA Peer Review team’s Audit Documentation Resources page at aicpa.org/documentation. Using these resources, the firm can:
About the authors
Ahava Z. Goldman (Ahava.Goldman@aicpa-cima.com) is an AICPA senior manager; Charles E. Landes (Chuck.Landes@aicpa-cima.com) is vice president—Professional Standards & Services at the AICPA; Carl R. Mayes Jr. (Carl.Mayes@aicpa-cima.com) is an AICPA senior manager.
To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Ken Tysiac, editorial director, at Kenneth.Tysiac@aicpa-cima.com or 919-402-2112.
AICPA resources
CPE self-study
For more information or to make a purchase, go to aicpastore.com or call the Institute at 888-777-7077.
Online resources
Research & References of Audit documentation: Tips for getting it right|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
Pingback: Buy viagra australia
Pingback: cheap cialis
Pingback: cialis discount
Pingback: cost of cialis
Pingback: viagra 100mg
Pingback: viagra for sale
Pingback: erection pills that work
Pingback: canada pharmacy
Pingback: cialis visa
Pingback: generic levitra
Pingback: vardenafil 20mg
Pingback: real money casino
Pingback: vegas casino online
Pingback: viagra without a doctor prescription
Pingback: online casinos
Pingback: real money casino app
Pingback: cialis prescription online
Pingback: cash loans
Pingback: no credit check loans
Pingback: payday loans online
Pingback: viagra for sale
Pingback: best real money online casinos
Pingback: cialis 20
Pingback: leta
Pingback: 20 cialis
Pingback: slot machine games
Pingback: buy cialis
Pingback: generic for cialis
Pingback: online casino games play for real money
Pingback: casino games
Pingback: casino game
Pingback: real money online casinos usa
Pingback: play for real online casino games
Pingback: viagra generic name
Pingback: sildenafil 100mg
Pingback: viagra buy
Pingback: buy cialis online reddit
Pingback: tadalafil 40 mg
Pingback: hollywood casino
Pingback: slot machines
Pingback: catapres 100mcg over the counter
Pingback: ceclor without a prescription
Pingback: how to buy ceftin 250 mg
Pingback: cephalexin 500mg tablets
Pingback: cipro 250 mg canada
Pingback: cheapest claritin
Pingback: empire casino online
Pingback: best casino games
Pingback: online casinos real money
Pingback: casino gambling
Pingback: chumba casino
Pingback: empire casino online
Pingback: owners car insurance
Pingback: car insurance quotes calculator
Pingback: car insurance usaa
Pingback: extremely cheap car insurance quotes
Pingback: car insurance quotes online quotes
Pingback: auto home insurance
Pingback: cheap car insurance quotes online
Pingback: geico car insurance quotes
Pingback: car insurance quotes estimate
Pingback: best personal loans no credit check
Pingback: payday loans with no credit check
Pingback: installment loans portland or
Pingback: online payday loans ohio
Pingback: no credit check personal loans
Pingback: cbd hemp oil capsules 450 mg
Pingback: reviews of cbd oil for anxiety
Pingback: cbd oil side effects in dogs
Pingback: cbd oil for pain relief
Pingback: cbd oil for cancer for sale
Pingback: ace homework
Pingback: paper back writer
Pingback: ace homework
Pingback: australian essay writing service
Pingback: essay writing online
Pingback: clonidine 0,1mg cheap
Pingback: colchicine nz
Pingback: combivent 50/20 mcg purchase
Pingback: coreg 12,5 mg generic
Pingback: compazine 5mg tablets
Pingback: crestor 20mg united kingdom
Pingback: how to buy cymbalta
Pingback: ddavp 10 mcg australia
Pingback: depakote without a prescription
Pingback: differin tablets
Pingback: how to purchase diltiazem
Pingback: order doxycycline 100 mg
Pingback: how to buy elavil 25 mg
Pingback: erythromycin 500 mg australia
Pingback: flonase nasal spray generic
Pingback: garcinia cambogia caps canada
Pingback: geodon 80 mg pharmacy
Pingback: hyzaar usa
Pingback: imdur 20 mg generic
Pingback: cost of imitrex 25 mg
Pingback: imodium 2mg for sale
Pingback: see this here
Pingback: indocin 50 mg cheap
Pingback: lamisil otc
Pingback: levaquin canada
Pingback: lopressor tablet
Pingback: meclizine united states
Pingback: where can i buy mestinon
Pingback: mobic 15mg purchase
Pingback: motrin 400 mg uk
Pingback: nortriptyline 25 mg otc
Pingback: phenergan 25mg over the counter
Pingback: plaquenil pharmacy
Pingback: prilosec without prescription
Pingback: proair inhaler coupon
Pingback: procardia generic
Pingback: proscar 5mg without a prescription
Pingback: protonix 20 mg cost
Pingback: pulmicort 100mcg tablets
Pingback: pyridium 200 mg generic
Pingback: reglan 10 mg without a doctor prescription
Pingback: remeron usa
Pingback: revatio 20 mg otc
Pingback: risperdal online
Pingback: robaxin 500 mg canada
Pingback: rogaine generic
Pingback: seroquel 50 mg tablets
Pingback: skelaxin otc
Pingback: spiriva 9 mcg medication
Pingback: tenormin 50 mg canada
Pingback: thorazine 50 mg united kingdom
Pingback: toprol 100 mg usa
Pingback: cost of tricor
Pingback: valtrex coupon
Pingback: verapamil usa
Pingback: voltaren australia
Pingback: wellbutrin 300mg no prescription
Pingback: zanaflex 2mg otc
Pingback: zocor generic
Pingback: zovirax nz
Pingback: zyprexa 10mg medication
Pingback: zyvox canada
Pingback: sildenafil coupon
Pingback: where can i buy tadalafil 80 mg
Pingback: furosemide 100mg united states
Pingback: escitalopram online pharmacy
Pingback: aripiprazole 15 mg tablets
Pingback: how to buy pioglitazone
Pingback: spironolactone 25mg without a doctor prescription
Pingback: fexofenadine 180mg without a prescription
Pingback: atomoxetine united states
Pingback: anastrozole online pharmacy
Pingback: irbesartan 150 mg canada
Pingback: dutasteride tablet
Pingback: olmesartan for sale
Pingback: where can i buy buspirone 10 mg
Pingback: where to buy clonidine 0.1 mg
Pingback: cefuroxime 125mg without prescription